April 2013. Vaisakhi @ Parliament; Self-Rule (sent to Baba Iqbal Singhji)

Baba Iqbal Singhji

The Kalgidhar Society, Baru Sahib via Rajgarh, Teh: Pachhard, Dist: Sirmore, Himachal Pardesh, 173101, India

Satsiriakal,

Re:  2013 Vasakhi Parliament & Shepherds Bush Feedback 

I hope this communication finds you physically well and emotionally healthy.

The Communiqué: 

 POINT ONE:

As an experienced figurehead, you began life as and have faithfully remained a sevadar, thus I am sure you will receive the following observation with an open mind, using the pointers tabled to improve your delivery and focus a purpose along a set of sensible attainable targets at a personal and communal level.

The Vasakhi television coverage from the UK parliament of your address left an imprint that the leading light of an embryonic education establishment lacked gravity in the opinion expressed. Your address came across as rambling rant. The fault for this is with your minders in the media. However, the saddest part of the Sikh media is that they are woodcutters detailed to produce exquisite fine royal china tableware. Unfortunately they neither have the talent nor the magnanimous nature to realise that they are not professional trained media journalistic quality capable.

However, it is their duty to make sure that you were aware of the question put to you and then your speech carefully chosen and your voice trained for a steady delivery of the rehearsed speech.

How sad.

However, sadness as a noun or sad as an adjective is a condemnation for the grand design a powerless politically naive community can ill afford. I am sorry but this is not good enough. In future, please, have the awareness not to say anything or limit your utterance to a few words only. Please be aware that speaking on a political stage is not the same as an emotional ramble on a gurdwara stage that you are experienced at.

POINT TWO:

I watched the opening of your speech from Sheperds Bush Gurdwara. You stated that the Jews following the second European war of the 20th century (2nd world war) announced that self-rule was an imperative requirement for the survival of their race and community. In fact each and every community-race expresses the same notion and desires self governance. Please talk to the Kurds, the minorities caught in Myanmar, the Coptic communities in Egypt or indeed the Sámi people of the artic region, and finally the Eskimo community-race. In this, let us not leave behind the indigenous races of north and south America or the aborigines of Australia. They all want the same, but why did it work for the Jews?

Traditionally, the Jews are a hated community regardless of which country they operate and flourish. They are always the entrepreneurs, but by default, as mainstream would not give them jobs. Through their enterprising survivalist skills they eventually became moneylenders. And historically have been accused of underhand dealings, which then resulted in their global persecution.

The Jews in Europe interbred with the European races to a point that they have lost their original racial skin colour. The original Jews had rich pigment than the current modern European Jews. The European Jews changed their names, and hidden behind that deceit they automatically attained high prestige office and authority, nevertheless, when their background was uncovered they were despised.

In addition to the skin camouflage, they through cultural dilution adopted the following changes after massive internal hemorrhage: Historically, the Arab dress mimics the traditional Jewish attire. However, the Jews stood out in the new countries of Europe and therefore the men had to copy their clothing to secure basic jobs. This led to them rejecting the skull cap in public. The women lacking self-esteem and personal inferiority complex argued successfully by refusing to wear clothing that looked alien in the new communities. They argued that head scarf could be replaced by wearing a fashionable wig.

Then they argued, as it was the show of the naked skin of the legs that was against their cultural requirement then why could they not wear thick woolen leggings, and also reduce the length of their skirt. After the second European war and the mass availability of nylon stockings and later tights, the Jewish woman rejected the thick leggings also. To this day, the traditional Jewish woman wears a wig when outside the house or when visitors call – hence their natural hair is covered. This change along with the copied accent and the change of name spelling, and its pronunciation, secured empathy within the community they chose to live.

Furthermore, one of the reason that aided their global survival and accomplishment can be seen in practice on the streets of Southall in the manner that the Muslims will only patronize Muslim businesses and the Afghan Sikhs business aid each other as an oath of survival. This collective inter business transaction at the expense of the outsider community eventually tarnished the Jews in the eyes of each and every country they operated.

However, to get rid themselves of the Jews from their midst the Europeans decided to ‘aid’ the formation of an artificial ancestral homeland in Palestine. The Arabs of that area were under British rule. The Arabs were imprisoned for having an offensive weapon. The offensive weapon was no more than household kitchen knife while the European Jews were allowed to carry modern guns. If a Jew killed an Arab, then his word that it was self defence was enough as a mitigating circumstance. However, if an Arab was caught carrying a knife he purchased for his family’s kitchen needs he was jailed without a trial.

The Jewish war of independence was orchestrated by the Europeans, where on one hand the Jews were armed by them and then the British troops made a half hearted attempt to fight and contain them. The British here means regiments of ill armed Arabs led by a British officer who were outgunned and as the Jews had prior knowledge of the defence they were up against – thus the Jews always defeated the British. The British ‘lost’ eventually. Israel was formed. A minority ruled the majority, with a loaded gun at the head of the majority Arabs.

The Europeans succeeded in (hopefully) removing a race they were uncomfortable with and this as a byproduct also has been a boon. In creating Israel, the Europeans have snarled the Arabs in a constant self-defeating war with a community armed to the teeth by the European race. And Israel acts as a proxy army for Race-Europeans interest.

So, Iqbal Singhji, please get your history into perspective before you start announcing half truths as away forward for establishment of a Sikh state.

POINT THREE:

This, the third point is part of the ongoing romantic idealism about Khalistan. Khalistan as a name will never attain statehood. It is not liked and does not carry the same positive vibration and respect as does Panjab. Panjab, as a name has far better chance of attaining statehood. But not Khalistan. In addition, Panjab will only come into fruitition if there are tangle advantage for several world powers in its formation.

In any case, just what is so special about Sikhs that they as a 2% minority should be accorded statehood? What, because they gave their lives? Who asked them for this protection? At that junction were they given cast iron sureties that if they killed themselves defending this that or the other then that would secure statehood? Get real. This is real-time politics and not some village panchayat goodwill gesture being honoured by return. Sikhs got themselves killed on an emotional high, then that was, and to this day is their lookout. Real life politics is clinically hard and emotion-less.

Shocking is it not?

However, let us get back to the drawing board with this demand. Please, secure and read the lengthy document I handed to Jaspal S Bains who is well known figure from Birmingham as the operator owner of a Sikh media paper. That document template is so simple and yet subtle. Sadly the self-delusional Sikh TV owners find me intimidating because I will not tolerate their daft self egotistical nonsense. Yet in me resides a vision that is painful to enact if a formal independent state is required into reality. Whereas they are reenacting 1979 onwards debacle of inciting anger culminating in another iron-fist clampdown in Panjab by India.

The current drugs addiction is not some grand plan by the Delhi seat. It is a direct result of a lost generation  killed in ‘encounters’ who automatically would have chastised, but their small children grew up  discipline-less and then this led to them lacking cohesive knowledge how to bring up their own children, a classic example of weak parenting. Interestingly, the lack of elder authority also witnesses lack of discipline in the young within the animal kingdom too. So let us not blame the Delhi seat for our own failings.

The annoying part is that sitting in the west the 1979 inciters never sent their own sons into the last ‘war of Panjab independence of 1980’s’. Thus, there is no hope of current fathers who are self professed armchair generals inciting independence of Panjab all over again ever going to send their own son’s to a new war in Panjab. Is there?

Harsh realities have to be faced. Hypocrisy has to be jettisoned.

I had the privilage of learning then teaching and guiding Hindus, Muslims, Buddhists, Jewish and Christian communities and general ‘non-aligned’ people about spiritual matters. I also gave political insight at a high level. The thing that stood out as a reality within all these communities was abject divisions and mistrust amongst themselves and yet uniformly they envied the unity they see within the Sikhs overall.  The problem with the Sikhs is that they lack the long enrich privilage that I have had. The problems within the Sikhs are veneer cracks and not the deep chasm of all other faith groups. Please tell the last time you heard, currently or historically, of Sikhs army fighting Sikh army over internal faith agenda? I repeat we Sikhs do not have the anywhere the same problems the other faiths have.

I have written and spoken often about a non-European constitution for all non-European races. Until that is not in place an independent Panjab is a nonentity.

In any case, the idea that utopia awaits Sikhs upon independence is just that. A utopian dream. The reality is the same type of indifference government that has existed in Panjab since independence of India is our future in an independent state. The connected will get off scot free. Uprising against the government will occur, and it too will be put down without remorse nor concern for human rights. So what exactly will change other than Sikhs will persecute Sikhs?

This is kaljug Bhai, this is kaljug. Just accept it. In this ‘age’ dog eats dog. There is no peace either way. Dogs regardless who is in power will still eat dog. And that is a truth humanity cannot and will not escape from…

…A Sikh of Guru’s, I remain a sevadar of the panth.

Satsiriakalji.

Avtar

Advertisements