Death of the Nuclear Weapon


The following assessment is based on my psychic abilities, and should be read in that vein.

The death of the nuclear weapon began in May 2017 and ended in June 2017. 

On 9th May 2017, the US Navy ship the USS Lake Champlain, a guided missile cruiser, collided with a South Korean fishing vessel in the international waters off Asia. A month earlier, it had been conducting exercises with other US and Japan naval ships as a show of force in the midst of heightened nuclear tensions with North Korea (San Diego Tribune, 9th Mau 2017). Both ships were able to travel safely onwards to port for repairs following the May incident.

Then, on 16th June, 2.30pm (local time, Japan), the USS Fitzgerald collided with a Philippine-flagged container ship 56 nautical miles south-west of Yokosuka, Japan. It had recently been fitted with an upgraded electronic satellite and nuclear system, and these were destroyed in the collision.

These two seemingly discrete incidents are closely connected, the first bringing the US and NATO computer-based defence system to its knees (in May 2017), while the second event then rendered it wholly inoperable (in June that same year).  

My psychic conjecture is that the collisions were the result of advancements in electronic warfare by a powerful Eastern state. These were used to jam the US naval and NATO’s nuclear weapons systems and communications satellites, and take over the naval ships’ command through remote access, thereby bringing them into collision.

The Eastern power behind the death of the nuclear weapon has thus asserted its technological superiority over the west and its warfare capabilities. In doing so, it has assumed a position of almost unassailable power and influence, which is already bringing about embryonic – but by all accounts, seismic – geopolitical transformations with far-reaching consequences.

Firstly, it was able to use its influence to move North and South Korea towards rapprochement, as evidenced by the historic meeting between their leaders on 27th April 2018 and their announcement of the Panmunjom Declaration for Peace, Prosperity and Unification – and complete de-nuclearisation – of the Korean peninsula.

That the North Korean leader stepped into the South, without causing humiliation or insult towards his South Korean counterpart, is testament to the guiding hand of the Eastern power who encouraged Kim Jong-un to send a delegation to participate in the Winter Olympics under a shared flag with South Korea.

The unification of Korea, some 65 years after the armistice that brought the war there to an end, will mark a significant shift in the geopolitics of the region. For sworn enemies to become comrades indicates there were no real deep differences between them at all, only those created and maintained by the USA, and the west more generally.

This augurs badly for the USA, who on top of having their entire nuclear weapons system over-rided, will in time announce their complete military withdrawal from the region, on the basis that Japan is capable of defending itself and that military presence is a cumbersome financial drain on the US budget.

The second repercussion of the Eastern power’s demonstrable strength and superiority over the USA and the west is that it is spurring a reassessment and realignment of allegiances in another region of the world that has – similar to Korea – been locked in seemingly intractable conflict under the aegis of the west.

Together, the transformation of formerly intransigent theatres of conflict – in and beyond Korea – into newfound allies is creating a real and deep-seated fear amongst western powers that peace will break out, and even worse, will be sustained.  

Yet it is entirely in keeping with the Eastern power’s strength and prowess twinned with its maturity that it will not announce its role as master power-broker. Instead, it is allowing the US – and the inimitable figure of Trump – to enjoy the accolade of brokering peace in Korea. 

Indeed, the historic milestone in Korea’s history represented by the rapprochement and de-nuclearisation promises of its two leaders, could not have been possible without Donald Trump’s election as US President. Here is an ill-disciplined businessman who has all the reliability, veracity, integrity and loyalty of a rat. His idea of governance is to scream, shout and hurl sarcastic abuse to all and sundry. He runs his government like a business and a fiefdom.

Only a non-career politician, such as Trump, could be sucked into an armed theatre by a national enemy and allow its advanced, human-controlled artifical intelligence warfare systems render a death-blow to his nation’s entire naval operation in Honolulu.

A seasoned politician would not have been baited into a war footing against a surrogate puppet state and allow an enemy to deal such a decisive and geopolitically transformative blow against his own country and NATO. It took a Nazi-styled, racist, redneck, white supremacist – Trump, basically – to answer the provocation offered by North Korea’s missile testing plans.

Trump, and the west, will be left to bask in the glory of the Korean peace deal, while I believe that they surely must know that this is small consolation for the fact that they have been overwhelmed by the superior technological power of a global opponent. The latter is happy for history to be written in this way, such is its confidence in its own geopolitical power and status.

The ascent of an Eastern plane and perspective of power importantly heralds the end of a race-dominated global agenda; and we must hope that based on recent developments in the Korean peninsula it also marks a significant move from hate- to care-politics, far removed from the subjugation-mentality of the race-Europeans.

If we need reminding of what the Eastern power has achieved as a result of its mastery of sophisticated electronic artificial intelligence – and the capability this gave them to rout the US Navy and its nuclear weapons system – we need only look at the fate of Russia.

Russia has achieved none of the mastery that might give it leverage over the US and the west. As a consequence, it has replaced the so-called ‘war on terrorism’ and Islamists as the prime bogeyman used by western states to keep their citizens in a state of fear. Controlling citizens’ fears, subjugating them in this way, is a critical bulwark of western political praxis. Western states distrust their citizens so deeply, and are themselves so fearful of being called to account by them for their failures in government, that they create external bogeymen to help maintain their citizens in a controlled and cooperative state that diverts them from attacking their own leaders.

Consider how a Russia asylum seeker and his daughter, who were allegedly poisoned using the deadliest nerve agent ever developed, managed to survive the massive biological damage that it caused, and live. Notwithstanding that these two people and their fates amount to nothing more than collateral damage in the eyes of both the west and Russia, it remains the fact that an immediate death would have put a quick and abrupt end to the global media frenzy that the UK – and subsequently its western partners – needed in order to make Russia an effective bogeyman that would keep its citizens’ interest and emotion diverted from other governance failures and weaknesses. 

The Eastern power that has manouevred itself into a position of primary geopolitical influence has eluded such a fate. It is now primed to create seismic geopolitical shake-ups of a kind that, while not unprecedented, are not part of living political memory.  



Race empowerment

In meditation, one’s aim is to surpass duality and attain non-attachment. However, the possibility of doing so is utterly dependent on your bio-frame confinement and limitation. Racial pigment and DNA dictate bio-frame confinement insofar as advanced meditation is concerned. There are ofcourse several other configurations that control DNA, but secular science has not figured them out yet, and I am not permitted to indicate them.

The meditation pathway is a very precise one. Non-human animals are in many cases superior to human-animals in as much as experience and maintenance of awakening state is concerned. The human-animal is caught in the illusionary frame, where it seeks to maintain superior awakening; while a veil is thrown over the consciousness of its psychology and its physical ability, predilection for desire, envy, and greed. These, in connection with the most vile ideas, produce new human lows that become the new normal.

Where a human does advance – maintaining detachment and aloofness while remaining kind, thoughtful, and selfless in their endeavours – then they move from the raw skin of the race-Europeans into a semi-pigmented skin tone. However, they retain their deeply negative hate psychology. Such development conjoined with hate refers to a group called the Muslims and/or the ultra right-wing orthodox.

However, if a Muslim or ultra right-wing orthodox advancing person continues to maintain a detached, aloof, selfless and thoughtful demeanour, it is reborn within the global influential sphere-space known as the landmass of India.

Having birthright in India, initially in northern India to be precise, the same obstacles have to be surmounted as before. The human-animal advances to the next birth-stage, which takes place in the south India genetic framework. Advancement from here moves into the darker skins associated with African and Aboriginal genetic frameworks.

Yet those of advanced genetic framework – Africans, Aborigines, and Indians among them – have in recent centuries been brutally conquered by vulgar and thoughtless race-European killing mechanisms and armaments. Globally, brutality was the byword of the race-European presence across the world, in exactly the same way as the ultra-orthodox Muslim presence is perceived today. It was ‘our way or death’.

But India has never seen the invader as an invader. The victims may be the Indians, but according to their psyche the humiliation is the invaders’ alone. Low level, un-evolved, fresh out of the mire of the marshes – this is how Indians historically have seen the invader; something to be pitied rather than a source of advanced theosophical concepts and realism.

Race-European ideas of imposition and subjugation are regarded by the Indian psyche as alien and retrograde. India’s maturity affords it the possibility of regarding the invader as a friend from whom to learn, and who no doubt will become part of the land as s/he learns about it. But make no mistake, while the British Raj is seen by British people as an exercise in power, to Indians you came as a bunch of idiots, and you left having learned very little about personal spiritual progress.

Now, Indians’ inner psyche tenders two options for dealing with the invader in their midst: (1) lose their advanced awakening state by mimicking the behaviour of the invader, and thus give up countless lifetimes of progress to accommodate and mirror the ignorance of the disdained and lowly invader, or (2) maintain their hard-earned advanced meditation status, and stay true to the ethos that is instilled in them from birth, namely, that each life has a purpose as well as its own reasoning complex.

And herein lays my current problem with Indians who land high positions in any given sector of a race-European institution. They attempt (very badly) to mimic race-European attitudes and behaviours. Their psyche counsels against this, which is why you often hear them exasperatedly proclaim that ‘the goras (whites) just don’t get it’. But regardless, these Indians continue to mimic the race-European. In doing so, they are forced into limiting their own ecological and spiritual solutions to the drive for enhanced productivity, where profits are not the sole criteria and responsibility to nature is paramount.

Take, for example, crime and punishment. Prior to the annex of Panjab, and India in general, the concept of theft didn’t exist. Sikhism and its kingdom was founded upon the concept of no wrong-doing at a personal level, such that even a murderer was exempt from prison but was made to work on his emotional state while working and living within the community. In the same historical period, people were hung for stealing an apple or a loaf of bread in Britain. Imprisonment without trial was unheard of in non-Muslim India and during the Sikh Raj of Panjab; whereas in Britain people were thrown in dungeons without trial for the most frivolous of reason.

Indians in the UK police force must bring the Indian mindset and viewpoint to bear on tackling crime here. So, for example, a person driving over the speed limit on a clear motorway should not be penalised, since nobody other than the driver and/or car occupants are affected. This is the kind of common-sense and humanity-based approach that Indian police officers should strive to instill in the police force, rather than mimicking their race-European colleagues. They must become vocal about applying commonsense interpretations and judgments when dealing with an incident.

The problem with breaking a problem down into it core elements, rather than taking a holistic and contextual approach, is that humans end up treating each other like machines.

We are not machines.

We require laws that reflect humanity, and human subjectivity in all matters. English law is geared for organizing society like a machine whose parts must be kept in good working order, but which is automated and un-human. It accepts only right or wrong; there is no grey area. This is perfect for running and maintaining an automated production line, but not for dealing with humans.

My call to Indians – and indeed other races – is not to mimic race-Europeans. You may think that in doing so you’re on a fast-track to equality. But as I argued in my previous post on female empowerment, equality is a nonsense; dignity must be the aim of all.

I leave you with one question – and be honest with yourself when answering: Precisely how materially and spiritually evolved do you think race-Europeans, including Anglo-Saxons, can possibly be after four hundred years and counting of killing darker skin-toned people across the globe?

And you want to be equal with them?!

No, me neither.

Female empowerment

In modern times, women have been conditioned – via systematic, psychological, cultural, emotional and domestic intimidation – to adopt male traits in their attitude, demeanour and behaviour. When this abnormal mentality pervades, it results in catatonic dogma, lack of generosity, questionable moral boundaries, and disenchantment with nature and living things. The only thing then left to differentiate between male and female are coarse voice, hairiness and testicles.

So, when women come into power mimicking, albeit ambivalently, male behaviour, modus operandi, and attitudes, they ought not to be regarded as feminist icons or role models. I do not recall Mrs. Golda Meir, the female Israeli Prime Minister, ever behaving like a man or losing her womanhood during office. By contrast, Mrs. Thatcher, and other women in public positions of absolute power have regularly degraded femininity, replacing it with pseudo-male attitudes and attributes, wrapped in a female guise.

One example of male mimicry is that which has crept into orthodox Sikhs living in the west. Sikh women are donning the turban in order to signify that they are not merely Sikh, but are Khalsa. Their reference point for doing so is a line falsely attributed to Guru Gobind Singhji, the tenth Sikh Guruji. The line indicates that a male Sikh who wears a small loose head covering is indeed not only a Sikh but one who is also ordained into the Khalsa (even if he trims his facial hair). A cult movement has developed around this in which Sikh women are encouraged – and feel emboldened – to wear the turban.

But a few things need to be considered before we respond to this demonstration of so-called equality with jubilance. The line was anonymously written, and corresponds closely to the ethos, themes, intellectual values, slogans and influence found in Hinduism and Islam. Furthermore, it occurs in a text which also details how to participate in bestiality and group sex – both antithetical to Sikh behaviour. Still further, the line and the text from which it is drawn, was composed in the late 1800s, almost a century after the demise of the tenth Guruji to whom it is attributed. Indeed, it differs clearly from the writing style, language, and sentence construction of Guru Granthsahibji which is worshipped in every Gurdwara across the world. Lastly, the line makes reference merely to a head covering, not to a turban specifically.

The movement amongst Sikh women to don the turban is the outcome of a line – barely understood and certainly not in context – that has been appropriated by a group of Sikhs who insist it is a diktat from the tenth Guruji. If the line were to be read in the context of the volume in which it appears, then these Sikhs are condoning – proactively supporting – anti-Sikh behaviours like bestiality, group sex, using subordinates’ wives for sexual gratification, Tantric and mantric meditation, and kundalini yoga. These are all distinctly un-Sikhlike.

In thus donning the turban, Sikh women are mimicking men, denigrating womanhood, and contravening Sikh ethos.

The thing is, Sikh women are brought up to not shirk responsibility. They are not brought up to mimic male behaviour, or to dress as if they were entering hand-to-hand combat.

Hinduism and Islam subdue their womenfolk as if they had the minds and intelligence of pre-pubescent children; while in race-European Christendom, (as opposed to Christianity practiced in other races), womenfolk are desperately trying to mimic male behaviour, as if such behaviour is the sole source of their worth.

How has this come about?

Semitic cultural beliefs, followed by the psychic development of mainland Europe after the collapse of the Roman Empire, have all cemented the subjugation of British womanhood.

According to Semitic belief, Eve was created from the rib of Adam, though quite how this happened it is a loss to explain. The notion of a woman coming from a man’s rib is at least better than Hindu beliefs that a woman’s worth is equivalent to that of the sole of a Hindu man’s shoes. Granted, Hinduism does not state explicitly where a woman comes from, but she is valueless nevertheless, apart from any value the man in charge of her life gives her. Indeed, if she bears only daughters she can be killed, and another woman brought to provide her husband with a son.

Only in Sikhism is there a written statement, by the founder of Sikhism, Guru Nanakdevji, that man would never exist if it were not for a woman. In a further metaphor-laden statement it is indicated that a woman can birth to a child without semen. Thus, in Sikhism, from the level I read and decipher it, it is clear that without woman-hood nature would cease to exist.

If woman-hood is the core catalyst sustaining life on earth, then why in relative terms is she accorded second-class status in society compared to men?

Male Semitic commentators maintain that Eve, beguiled by a serpent, enticed Adam with the apple. Adam ate the apple and fell from grace. Thus, from my reading, he remained a demigod, but a flawed one.

Semitic belief from this point then begins its fascination with demigods.

In Vedic scriptures demigods are full of wrath, exhibiting the nine negative emotional and mental attributes that restrict inner awakening. Persian, Egyptian, Greek and then Roman cultures mirror these Vedic concepts closely. Their demigods have exactly the same demeanors, attitudes, and vulnerabilities. But these are demigod character traits as narrated by humans.

The question arises: If demigods posses human traits, qualities and fragilities are they really demigods at all? No. They are you. They are the product of the narrator’s desire for admiration and adulation from his peers, as if the narrator himself was a demigod. It is a point often overlooked.

The demigods of the Semitic story are thus a human construction. The storyteller is human and makes things up to fit his own needs and foibles. In the Adam and Eve story, the storyteller justifies his desire and constant need for sex. He places the burden of blame for his own calculating, uncontrollable sexual appetite, on Eve. Eve becomes the first sexual predator of western world consciousness.

Genuine demigods are so because they have transcended the human confinement that restricts personal awakening and growth. A demigod has no concept of aggression, domination, and subjugation. Nor, in the demigod world do concepts such as air, water, food, clothing, sex and toilet exist. Therefore, a demigod cannot be duped into consuming physical food, which in the realm of demigods does not even physically exist, there being no need to eat or drink.

In the domain of the demigod there is also the capacity to merge back into the Akaal – a concept only found in Sikhism, in Guru Granthsahibji.

Creation, regardless how you perceive it, was the result of either an implosion or explosion. From the Akaal separated a particle of Akaal. The following is the first time the concept has been shared publicly, albeit it is written figuratively in the Sikh’s Guru Granthsahibji. For the particle to separate from the Akaal there had to have been duality (though this does not correspond to our sense of type of duality).

The separated particle had no shape, image, or presence in our sense. But as it lost its Akaal state its profile changed. It underwent several monumental stages of metamorphosis, before it coagulated (expanded) into a state that is now accepted as the condition for pre-atom formation. Eventually it expanded to become the molasses we see as the unseen and un-registerable presence, or light to use another word. Thereafter, upon further decay, it turned into what is called the unstruck melody; and upon yet further decay, matter started to form. Eventually, the universe as we know it was formed.

The separated particle, and its attempts to be reabsorbed back into the Akaal is what the story of Adam, Eve, the snake and the apple is all about.

Eve represents the separated particle and thus the primary governing energy of creation; and in relative terms to the main body it is feminine. Adam represents coagulated matter, the lower order brought into existence by Eve (the Akaal particle); and is the male energy to Eve’s female energy. The snake represents unevolved knowledge, thought and will that purports to be guiding wisdom. In older depictions, the snake is twin-bodied but emanates from one root.

The apple represents a combination of false realities. The fibrous part is Maya – nourishing, mesmerising, and enticing. Encased within it is the seed, the pip. One must consciously enter the pip and, via its inner connection, travel through the inside of its branches and make one’s way down to the trunk, and from there into the root system. At that juncture, the nourishing aspect has to be understood, until one becomes minute enough to enter this element. Being so minute, you have presence but no shape. Remember, any given cell structure has seventy thousand working parts. One has to become small enough that the constituent parts of an atom are huge in comparison. One has to become the holding mechanism that gives integrity to the smallest known component, and endeavour to become smaller still. You must become nothing. Your ultimate goal is to become the escaped particle that merges back into the Akaal…and Akaal is everywhere.

If a woman had explained story of Adam, Eve, the serpent, and the apple, then it might have gone something like this: The two-bodied, two-headed serpent, representing change and choice made Eve realise that, having separated from Akaal, she had to negotiate Maya (the road-map) differently. Maya required that Self-matter had to be sustained somehow, and matter had to be used to do so. Thus, consuming that which would sustain the Self-matter became critical to building pathways towards realignment with Akaal.

This possible female perspective contains none of the sexual fantasy elements of the male telling, and instead deals pragmatically with the situation at hand. By recasting the story of Adam and Eve through different frames, we can see how ideas take hold and deny legitimate expression of the placid reality of genders, communities, and races.

Currently in the western world, women who pursue and eventually reach the heights of their profession seldom do so on the merit of their female worldview; rather they do so by mimicking male aggression and male worldview. Simply mimicking narrow male attributes such as dominance, pride, ego, rudeness etc., does not embed a woman’s sense of how to evolve a business or institution. One might as well employ a transvestite and lay claim to gender equality.

There is no such thing as equality. Dignity – yes. Equality – no.

Exactly how a man can claim equality with a woman who gives birth to life is beyond me! It is not, and never has been equality, but dignity, that should be the core of gender identity, racial respect, and self-worth. Equality is an idiocy dreamt up by Anglo-Saxon, or race-European, men sitting around with a drink in hand, passing the time of the day. Just like the idea of lying flat on a bed to deliver a baby was dreamt up by male doctors who knew better than a mother how she needed to contort her body to best counter labour pains and give birth.

Gender and race equality are as dumb as accepting that machines should replace humans at work, rendering them worthless and valueless simply because a handful of greedy industrialists seek ever-increasing profits over their duty of care to their fellow humans.

A female should bring into her profession feminine senses and sensibilities, and she should be promoted according to her ability to balance productivity and results, (where, productivity and profit are different from the narrow, blinkered, Anglo-Saxon male version).