The facebook inspired race hatred Anglo-Saxon with support from their fascists mainland European counterparts are still following me on their social media sites and ran another run in my local high street to see my reaction prior to an attack. This time I informed the police who I understand took decisive action. I thank the UK police for that. I am still capturing the faces of the individuals involved and will begin to post them online as race-hate fascists.

Death Seduces Life: Expanded consciousness & Mental Health 

Romans 6:23 claims the ‘wages of sin is death’. But what of those people who hear voices and go on to commit suicide?

In today’s world, so many kinds of pressure can and do lead to suicide, and they aren’t necessarily always preceded by suicide indicators such as self-harm or socially visible depression. Suicide rates in the United Kingdom are declining, and have been since the highs of the 1980s and 1990s, but they appear more prevalent in the media, and are increasingly talked about in terms of mental health.

Now, death has always seduced life. Rather than bringing fear, panic, terror, and distress, it has always been noted as a welcome mergence of life into death for the individual. But this is only true about natural death. Suicide presents a difficult configuration altogether.

For one thing, suicide appears to transgress the natural relationship between life and death, to sin against the rules. These rules say that life must be lived, endured even, with fortitude and resolution. The gift of life, once given, must not be rejected. To do so is to sin. Such obscene views refuse to countenance the dire predicaments that may lead somebody to punish – or seek release for – themselves, and give their lives over to the disquieting and resonant voices telling them to die.

Rabid disregard for the collapse of a person’s entire personal, social, professional, psychological ecology leads preachers to reduce suicide to sin, and leads colleagues in the workplace to dismiss it as a personality trait, a weakness. Either way suicide is cast as the ultimate in moral turpitude.

The question remains however: What compels people to commit suicide?

Regrettably, the obscene distaste of dealing with the issue, whereby theological thinking is masked by a modern charade of sound-bites, is as useful as holding up a candle to the midday sun.

So why do I not support the view that suicide is a punishment or indeed a sin?

Indulge me; as I explain my position using metaphors and analogies. For me, they deliver scriptural and divine reasoning in simple terms.

To explain the personal hell and conflict of an individual we have to understand concepts of reality using a ‘states of sentience’ construct.

I have a burning desire to drive form London to Tashkent, capital of Uzbekistan. One day I set out. On the ferry across from England to France I meet a party who has traveled from Bristol, a city ninety miles west of London, and who is also heading to Tashkent. Their vehicle is big whereas mine is light and carries just me, my sister and her daughter. There are five routes to Tashkent. We debate their relative merits and ease, and we agree that only two routes suit us given our starting point. Upon alighting the ferry I take the lead and create distance between myself and the Bristol party. I make several leisurely stops on the way. One day, I note the Bristol party in my rear-view mirror. And in the distance, in front of me, I note a vehicle heading towards me from the direction of Tashkent. 

I drive leisurely now, allowing the Bristol party to get close enough to overtake me. As it does the vehicle from Tashkent passes me in the opposite direction. 

In this analogy, the Bristol party represents my past setting off ninety miles behind where I am in London. The Tashkent vehicle is my future – passing me by and heading into my past. The point where we meet is the fulcrum portal, where past, present, and future exchange vital information and energies. 

Depending on which of the three vehicles’ occupants is more dominant, which is more malleable, and which more inert, the exchange will impact them accordingly. But the confluence of their different energies will certainly leave all three parties with a new set of emotional overloads that will need readjusting to.

An unknown truth seldom shared with the general public, but borne out by ethnographies of people and societies around the world, is that the future has already happened and that it shapes and makes the past. The past does not make the future. Furthermore, the past and the future coexist at whatever point is considered the present. 

Another analogy:

Consider a ten storey tower block. The apartments on each floor follow a daily activity pattern, right from the ground floor to the penthouse suite. Individual activity differs, but the dawn-to-dusk, general lifestyle pattern is identical. Wealth and technology are more developed the higher one gets, with the lower floors being poorer and having allotments to grow their own vegetables.

Each floor is a relative future to the one(s) below. Now, if there is an electrical fault then the entire tower suffers, and a collective calamity is experienced; but as the electrical failure takes time to ascend the tower, the timing of each floor and each apartment’s experience of the calamity varies. And if people from an apartment aren’t at home during the electrical failure, and return after it’s been fixed, then of course they will not have suffered at all. Likewise, the higher floors have an independent generator for precisely such mishaps, and they sail through the problem unaware.

This is our actual reality. We are imprisoned as assets into a set layer of karma. Karma is not the action-reaction chain that people believe. That is samskar. Karma is the set-in-stone collection of conditions that cannot be changed: thus, what will be, will be. This is why divine Beings never interfere in the scheme of things. The overall administrator of this is the one Atma. Atma is incorrectly explained as the soul. Soul is antrekarna in eastern thought – the parameters within which the individual organs of anything in a particular plane of existence operate. This means that albeit the organs are identical, the antrekarne, the soul, differs in its expression. In the same way the organs of a person from the future will be similar to ours but its antrekarna, the soul – the internal working mechanism – will differ from ours. 

To return to the three cars from Bristol, London and Tashkent… when they crossed each other, the sharing of that time–space meant all parties carried an indelible mark from the impact. They each experienced a kind of excess, but since they could each only make sense of that excess in their own set operational parameters, one of the parties could interpret it as a sensation to drive in such a manner a to commit suicide. One of the parties, conversely, might experience the exchange of energies as a creative sensation.

Thus, a person who feels compelled to commit suicide is not suffering from mental health problems but from the experience of expanded consciousness, which we all have, and which is in fact our natural birthright to enjoy. 

Mental health, as currently framed and discussed, does not exist. Individuals are experiencing expanded consciousness – an excess of energies – which the current western medical councils do not understand. This is nowhere more evident than in the ever-compendium of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders, which labels every emergent form of expanded consciousness as a disorder and hence reduces it to ‘mental health’.  

I ask each of you who is feeling suicidal: consider this sensation, this impulse, as the resonance and channeling of past and/or future through you, creating an excess which your organs decipher as suicidal – because the reality is that you are not programmed to commit suicide.

The above is a very simplistic explanation, as I have not added multi-functionality as a component of the explanation and analysis that would help round out our understanding of suicide. With the integrated understanding that multi-functionality provides, a much clearer picture emerges; but that requires a book. 

The Facebook inspired race-hatred Anglo-Saxons with support from their fascists mainland European counterparts are still following me on their social media sites and ran another run-in on my local high street to see my reaction prior to an attack. This time I informed the police who I understand took decisive action. I thank the UK police for that. I am still capturing the faces of the individuals involved and will begin to post them online as race-hate fascists.

Brexit Mirage

Brexit, like autism, requires understanding, care, empathy, and direction. It is an abstract concept, whose admirers are mesmerised by a cheery, sentimental blend of world domination that none but a very privileged few ever experienced. Ordinary slum citizens were treated in that world with much the same contempt as the conquered. And who were the conquered? Civilised peoples who treated the colonizing strangers at their door as friends, though they turned out to be anything but.  

Worship of machines, lack of sophistication, technical ignorance of distant lands, and a pith-helmet mentality coalesced to induce in the ordinary Anglo-Saxon citizen a dream-like belief that they and their killing machines were unassailable. They faithfully believed that regardless of geopolitical changes the bully spirit would prevail – needing only to intimidate, harass, threaten, and maybe kill some browns and blacks, and subjugate and enslave them, in order to maintain their sadistic mastery over the world.

However, the politicians in the era of ‘empire’ knew the truth; just as the politicians of today know the truth – that it’s all bull. But the desire for power and a very healthy pension is itself so powerful, beguiling, and corrupting, that politicians will do literally anything to secure their political futures: buying votes with barefaced lies that trade on people’s latent and enduring belief in their own sovereign supremacy. It is the only way to truly guarantee the prize that is the politician’s pension. Let’s see how genuinely Brexiteer politicians hold their beliefs when asked to share their generous incomes and eventual pensions with ordinary Brexiteers living on income support.

When hard-nosed Brexiteer MPs go on their several holidays a year, how many of them invite their loyal, low income, Brexit supporters to join them?

The problem with us, the voters, is that we are ignorant and gullible enough to buy into anything that suggests our country’s ills are down to the hard-working foreigner. 

UK politics is rife with free-market ideology, except when foreigners ‘take British citizens’ jobs’. In fact, Brexit MPs supported the free market forces that allowed this to happen – after all, they’re close associates of the employers who take on foreigners. But they pretend not to be, and get the unsuspecting public to vote Brexit in order to shore up their political futures, and the generous salaries and pensions that accrue from that.    

The Brexit debacle is a stitch up, and each one of us has been sewn up like a kipper.

The top politicians knew exactly what their role was to be in Brexit. The whole drama is contrived: a strictly controlled, totally stage-managed act, in which we have been duped into siding with one of the two camps.

Consider the UK’s GDP in 2017 – it was 2.6 trillion. By comparison, Germany’s was 3.5 trillion, France’s 2.5 trillion, the USA’s 19 trillion, the European Union’s 19 trillion, and China’s 12.2 trillion.

The UK going it alone is like an Asian corner-shop opening up next to a big four supermarket despite having 0.000000001% of the latter’s turnover! And I am being extremely generous to the Asian corner-shop turnover in this analogy, given that it would never have the buying power of the supermarket. What the supermarket achieves in turnover in its busiest five minutes, the local Asian corner-shop cannot achieve in over ninety years. 

Ordinary Brexiteers don’t seem to understand this simple fact. Their Brexit-baying MPs do.

However, Brexiteer MPs don’t care that they are skinning you, duping you into lining their pockets by re-electing them because of your misplaced sentimentality about Britian uber alles – while you the citizen will suffer when the post-Brexit squeeze occurs.

And here is the best part. The same MPs will still crop your social security payments – no small thing in a country where Anglo-Saxons comprise the largest ethnic group living on social benefits, the majority of them Brexiteers.

You are buying into the fake news that your Brexiteer MPs are targeting foreigners, when the truth is that you, their supporters, are the ones being mercilessly squeezed.

Do you seriously believe that the UK’s politically savvy politicians didn’t know that the Prime Minister cannot repeatedly bring the same deal to a vote in Parliament? Even an elementary student of politics knows this can’t be done.

Watch the news anchors who are championing the Brexit agenda. Have you ever wondered why they are so vociferous in their support? Because all semi-intelligent people know how bad an idea Brexit is, but the charade requires that news anchors and talk-show hosts keep the news alive by continuously peddling the idea of Brexit. The fires of ethno-nationalism have to be stoked continually. 

The vote for Brexit has always been about one thing: racism. The majority of Anglo-Saxons want Britain populated by a pure Anglo-Saxon race. They want all foreigners, and citizens with brown and black skins, removed or indeed killed in race hate massacres. But the Brexiteer MPs know that without foreigners and people of brown/black skins, this country will go into economic free-fall.

As I watched the charade of a third referendum, (the first was when the UK joined the EC, the second was when the UK decided – with a wafer thin majority – to leave), I felt sorry for the ordinary citizens who’ve been led by their emotional noses, like a dancing bear with a rope through its nose.

Brexit cannot happen. The painful truth is that the average Anglo-Saxon is painfully work shy, lacks any sense of responsibility, and is mired in rudeness, aggressiveness, thoughtlessness, and a deep sense of entitlement.

If you were running a business who would you employ? A work-shy, entitled, jobsworth; or someone who goes the extra mile each and every day? 

And given that Brixteer MPs’ incomes depend on the country maintaining its wealth, just who do you think those MPs believe is most likely to help achieve and maintain that wealth? 

Brexiteer MPs poured fuel on your demand for foreigners to be kicked out of the NHS, and two years later they are recruiting people with brown skin at an unprecedented rate to replace the East Europeans who are being kicked out.

When these Brexiteer MPs visit brown/black areas their spiel is that without the rich and valuable contribution of those goups’ workforce, and their businesses, the UK would struggle. Yet when they visit your area they fuel racism and hatred against the same brown and black people. 

We the citizens are mugs. We are prepared to steal from each other, and kill each other. But Brexiteer MPs don’t threaten, steal from, or want to kill their anti-Brexit MP colleagues.

Why?

Because the Brexit drama is a charade. No more, and no less.