UK WILD WEST KILLINGS: MIND CONTROL

I recall, a few decades ago, the jubilant football terrace chant of ‘eight-nil’. It referred to eight Indians who had been killed in a motorway accident, and was chanted by the English, who either believed we Asians didn’t get the reference and were gullible enough to take the chant at face value, or who knew that we knew and knew they could get away with the taunt by couching it in seemingly innocuous football banter. 

One day, while visiting the city of Sheffield, I was racially accosted and subjected to the 8-0 chant by a group of skinheads. One of their number threatened me, saying that an 8-0 could be arranged at any moment of their choosing. I was incensed. At the time, I was undergoing intense spiritual training and so I curbed my anger. But the racist encounter left me with a deep monochromatic pain, as it did so many Indians at the time who were similarly threatened. It was a long drive back home afterwards. 

Samskar always kicks back in a painful way. And for the city of Sheffield that has meant that minor mishap evolved to become a major tragedy for the city and its people.

Similarly, if we take Enoch Powell’s ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech, which seemingly references the one-way killing of coloured residents in the UK, samskar holds that the blood of brown and black people will amount to a pool, but it is the blood of the whites that will constitute the  river.

That is to say, Enoch Powell’s speech will come true. There will be a full-scale civil war in the country. Immigrants will indeed be the initial targets of violence, and their blood will spill. But the river to which Powell alludes? When it comes, it will be white blood.

How are we to make sense of this? 

It is easy enough when we consider how much violence and suffering is stage-managed by the country’s security forces. The Grenfell tragedy so-called is more than that – it was a massacre, the outcome of a warning to Islamists. Likewise, the Salisbury Novichok poisoning was a provocation to heat up the country’s conflict with Russia. In short: the security forces have to keep the spectre of an enemy – of multiple enemies – alive in the public imagination, lest they lose precious government funding and become obsolescent. 

From the Grenfell massacre and the Salisbury poisoning to the current spate of wild west knife-killings in London – all are stage-managed.

But how?

Operating in the realm of calculating, cut-throat darkness that is their norm, the spooks are deploying a fantastic weapon. The grenade they control is in the hands of each and every one of us. It is the mobile phone.

What have mobile phones to do with London’s knife crime?

Well, the killings began with one highly sensitive and emotionally unstable person receiving an offensive text from a rival. Under normal circumstances, the text would have incurred a counter-text, equally as offensive. And that would be an end to the matter. However, this time it has led to a spate of fatal stabbings – in broad daylight, no less.

Mobile phones have three purposes: as a communicative device, to pinpoint a person’s location, and to engage in mind manipulation. 

The mind control function of mobile phones works by amending the screen flicker rate to trigger a specific emotion and response in any given individual. Turning your phone off does not mitigate or prevent mind control taking place through these devices. When switched off, they can be used to deliver an audio frequency beyond conscious human and (animal) hearing.

So, a given target will have their voice recorded while they are speaking to another person. The captured recording will be put through software which determines the brain-wave pattern associated with that person’s speech. Brain-wave patterns are as unique as fingerprints and DNA. Now, an audio message can be composed and communicated to the target that is modulated precisely for their brain-wave pattern – only they will be able to ‘hear’, albeit not in the normal sense of hearing. Over time these wave signals build up the required emotional mindscape in a person, necessitating only a trigger wave signal to impel that person to act or respond to a situation in a highly specific way. 

Thus, a rival’s needling and offensive text message will no longer yield a correspondingly offensive text in response. Through the mobile phone device, the mapping and control of emotions is delivered via wave signals, leading the text recipient to go and stab their rival instead. 

The end result is the domino-effect stabbings that have erupted across London this year.

That the murders are black-on-black help the police and other security forces make the argument that more money and powers need to be allocated to them by the government. On the other hand, if the spate of killings gives rise to efforts to redress the social and other problems that the black perpetrators and victims face, and which force them into this life of kill or be killed, then the police and security forces would lose out. Thus, the problem has to appear to be relatively multi-racial, to affect not only young black men but people in the capital generally. So, the spooks have allowed some (a tiny proportion!) white people to be targeted through the mobile phone delivered wave signals 

Returning to Enoch Powell’s prophecy; it will come to pass. That much is true. It will be triggered by the kind of technological mind control techniques already in use in the examples described above. Civil war will be ignited in the UK by an external force beaming a relay of mind-control waves that affects the entire population. Cyber war is not about machines facing off against other machines. Not yet. It will start with humans using the latest technology to attack, kill, and conquer fellow humans without launching a formal invasion.

Controlling a person’s brain-wave to execute the kill order requires abjectly high levels of anger. This is built up over time, through successive wave signals being transmitted to a person to reconfigure their emotional mindscape. But it also works wonderfully in people who already exhibit and have existing high levels of anger. Anglo-Saxons excel in this – especially towards people of other races.

Race-hate is a fantastically easy portal through which to gain access and control the mass population. The enemy, sitting thousands of miles away, does not even need to cross borders to push a target people’s self-destruct button. It only needs to cue up the visual images that trigger hatred in one person towards another, in one group towards another – and access to execute civil war, and mass death, is there for the taking.

For an international example, we need look no further than the India PM’s introduction of Adhaar cards. These store biometric, financial, employment, tax and all other public forms of information about the country’s citizens. The best part is that Modi is storing this information off-shore – in the USA. He claims that it is safe and secure there. Really? A foreign power holds details pertaining to every part of your citizens’ life, and we trust them to keep it secure? I don’t think so. America can – and will – make use of the information to ignite civil war in India. And other countries are jumping on the bandwagon, which means the USA could ultimately hold control over – and manipulate – people across the world. It is the start of nouveau-slavery and recolonisation from a distance.

Reverting to the UK once more: Although non-whites will die – so too, in mass numbers, will the white of the UK – and theirs will be the river of blood that Enoch Powell foresaw.

Is there a buffer to prevent mass mind control?

Yes.

Will I share it with you?

No. 

Why not?

Because you guys are awaiting your opportunity to murder me and my sister. So, do you really think that I am going to help you in any way, let alone to access your natural and organic defence mechanisms against your own eventual destruction?

 

Advertisements

First year anniversary of race-hatred and stalking by a Death Squad

TERENCE WOOD (group admin), STEPHEN DARTNALL, ANNA GRAHAMS, DAN McSCAT, DAVID MOORE, PAUL COWNIE, IAN LLOYD, TERENCE McGLYNN, RAY SMUT, ANDY TOMLINSON, MARK WHEELER, BRAIN TAIT, DANNY FLANDERS, GARY SHAW, DAVE POTTER, DENNIS TRIDENT.

The above named took part in attacking Sikhism and the Sikh turban, Sikh race, Sikh diet, and Sikh skin colour in the most derogatory terms as members of the Facebook group “ALL JOKES, ONE LINERS & GAGS WITH REASONABLE ADMIN” (as it was known on 7th October 2017). Following investigation by the UK police, Facebook went on to close the group for its racist, fascist, misogynist, in-your-face diatribe. But “ALL JOKES, ONE LINERS & GAGS WITH REASONABLE ADMIN” is back up and running again, laughably claiming to be the antithesis of its original self!   

THE ABOVE-NAMED INDIVIDUALS WERE MEMBERS OF THE ORIGINAL GROUP I CAME ACROSS, AND ARE AMONGST THOSE WHO HAVE ORCHESTRATED AND UNLEASHED A WHOLE YEAR OF RACE-HATE TERROR, INCLUDING STALKING ME AND MY FAMILY, IN ORDER TO KILL ME/US.

THIS IS THE STORY OF THE WHITE BREXITEER REALITY FACING ALL NON RACE-EUROPEANS WHO DARE TO REMAIN IN BRITAIN FOLLOWING BREXIT.

On 7th October 2017, encouraged by my family I joined Facebook, my first foray into social media. 

I joined groups whose members were mature adults. One such group was a no-holds barred sense of humour, with 18,000 members, whose Facebook images were all non-white (though this turned out to be a lie). My own sense of humour is quite English, based on wry observation and dry wit, so the Facebook group called, “All Jokes, One liners & Great Gags with Reasonable Admin” seemed right up my street. I’ve lived in the UK my entire life, and am more English than not in terms of my outlook, attitude and choices, so I thought I’d enjoy participating in the group’s banter. At the same time, however, my ethics are those of a turban-wearing Sikh. I’ve worn the turban since childhood, and never renounced it even when fear of constant attack drove so many other Sikhs to abandon theirs.

Anyway, I was accepted into the group and noted the members’ typical English banter: Misogynism, racism, and vile hate-language was the norm. I limited my interaction to those who were middle-of-the-road. However, on the very first day of my joining, one member took an exception to my turban (I had uploaded a photo of myself in my naiveté) and began hurling racial abuse of the sort that I’d not heard since the early 1960s. This person wasn’t even alive then – unlike me – which means race-hatred has been alive and thriving through generations of white British people. In response to their disgusting and derogatory remarks I put one over the person in the course of our interaction, and another member asked them how it felt to be played.

The group member went ballistic. This seems odd given that English banter is all about getting one over the other person, and acknowledging when you’ve come off second best. What this lot didn’t understand was that I grew up hearing race-hate abuse. I have several putdowns ready in response to each one. But it all depends on the situation. Most of the time, we Asians will leave the matter alone.

After-all, race-hate has a limited grammar and set of expressions even as it touches on every single aspect of another’s identity – their image, religion, culture, heritage, history, attire, and diet – in the most disgusting way possible. So most of the time you sit, bide your time, wait for the dust to settle and for things to return to normal.

On 13th October 2017, six days after joining the Facebook group “All jokes, One Liners & Great Gags with Reasonable Admin”, Terence Woods, the group administrator, barred me. 

And suddenly began one whole year of threats to kill me and my 70 yr old sister.

The race-hatred against me and my sister spans the UK as well as the continent, and both our images have been posted on various social media sites. The race-haters arrange themselves in large groups, monitoring our movements using mobile phones. They’ve done several test runs to see how I’d react to an attack from the front, side, and behind. As a Sikh I am honoured that it takes 15-20 of these brave-heart British bulldogs, who are in their 20s – 40s to threaten and intimidate me. The UK police force initially and now once again (after a hiatus) is officially helping them to pinpoint my movements using nationwide CCTV cameras. 

The anniversary of the race-hate stalking and intent to kill me is around the corner. The race-haters will settle their score with me during this period. Several have knocked on the door of the house to make sure I have got the message and know what’s coming. But not a single one of these brave-hearts is willing to leave his full name and address so that I and a couple of Sikhs and other Asians can visit his house at my convenience.

This is your – white people’s – country, right? And you want us non race Europeans out? Well, brown and black people make up the majority population on the planet – so how about you get off my planet?

You love Brexit, and you are just waiting for it to come into force so that you can kill us and drive us over the white cliffs of Dover, right? Well, how about you get out of the lands where you are lording it over indigenous people and their lands. Let’s start with you lot getting out of Australia, New Zealand, Tasmania, and north and south America.

On 19th October 2017, in a Mail Online article, Isobel Frodsham reports a Mr Joshua Dryden, a worker at Sainsbury’s Kingsway branch, Derby, as saying, ‘They live in my country, but do not talk my language, they wait for the prices to be cut and then buy..’ 

The point of this race-hate expression is not that ‘they’ do not speak my language. The reality is that ninety-nine percent of white Brits hate all people of colour, and it has sod all to do with whether they speak the goddamn language or not. 

How many white Australians speak any of the Aboriginal languages?

How many race-Europeans in north and South Americans speak any of the First Nation languages?

The rule of speaking a country’s mother tongue clearly only applies to the non-English in the UK, and it is nothing more than an excuse for, and expression of, your deep and genuine psychopathic hatred and desire to kill anything you feel like.

You begged the rest of the world to come to your defence in your hour of need, during what you call the first world war. Sikhs answered your call out of COMPASSION (not gullibility!), and once things had been settled in your favour in 1918, your colonel Reginald Dyer went on to shoot and kill 1000 Sikhs in a massacre in Amritsar.

The Sikhs never forgot that massacre, the thank you they got for laying down their lives during the First European war 1914-1918. 

Yet when you came begging a second time, in the Second European war of 1938-1945, they again answered the call out of COMPASSION. 

Sikhs and Indians living here in the UK have learned at close quarters that the English do not understand COMPASSION. And if ever another cry for help comes out to us, we will not come to your aid out of compassion. 

You have taught us to become cold-hearted, fledgling psychopaths just like you.

Bear that in mind as the October period draws near, and the moment of your murderous intent with it, remember I will do whatever it takes to defend my 70 yr old sister’s life.

You can still back off permanently from your murderous intent towards me and my sister. 

You can choose to accept with good grace that we non-race Europeans who have lived among you for so long can give as good as we get when it comes to making disgusting race-based remarks masked by good old English humour.

However, with pride I have to acknowledge that history will judge this moment where almost 65 million white Brits have gathered together to kill one orthodox Sikh.

Race empowerment

In meditation, one’s aim is to surpass duality and attain non-attachment. However, the possibility of doing so is utterly dependent on your bio-frame confinement and limitation. Racial pigment and DNA dictate bio-frame confinement insofar as advanced meditation is concerned. There are ofcourse several other configurations that control DNA, but secular science has not figured them out yet, and I am not permitted to indicate them.

The meditation pathway is a very precise one. Non-human animals are in many cases superior to human-animals in as much as experience and maintenance of awakening state is concerned. The human-animal is caught in the illusionary frame, where it seeks to maintain superior awakening; while a veil is thrown over the consciousness of its psychology and its physical ability, predilection for desire, envy, and greed. These, in connection with the most vile ideas, produce new human lows that become the new normal.

Where a human does advance – maintaining detachment and aloofness while remaining kind, thoughtful, and selfless in their endeavours – then they move from the raw skin of the race-Europeans into a semi-pigmented skin tone. However, they retain their deeply negative hate psychology. Such development conjoined with hate refers to a group called the Muslims and/or the ultra right-wing orthodox.

However, if a Muslim or ultra right-wing orthodox advancing person continues to maintain a detached, aloof, selfless and thoughtful demeanour, it is reborn within the global influential sphere-space known as the landmass of India.

Having birthright in India, initially in northern India to be precise, the same obstacles have to be surmounted as before. The human-animal advances to the next birth-stage, which takes place in the south India genetic framework. Advancement from here moves into the darker skins associated with African and Aboriginal genetic frameworks.

Yet those of advanced genetic framework – Africans, Aborigines, and Indians among them – have in recent centuries been brutally conquered by vulgar and thoughtless race-European killing mechanisms and armaments. Globally, brutality was the byword of the race-European presence across the world, in exactly the same way as the ultra-orthodox Muslim presence is perceived today. It was ‘our way or death’.

But India has never seen the invader as an invader. The victims may be the Indians, but according to their psyche the humiliation is the invaders’ alone. Low level, un-evolved, fresh out of the mire of the marshes – this is how Indians historically have seen the invader; something to be pitied rather than a source of advanced theosophical concepts and realism.

Race-European ideas of imposition and subjugation are regarded by the Indian psyche as alien and retrograde. India’s maturity affords it the possibility of regarding the invader as a friend from whom to learn, and who no doubt will become part of the land as s/he learns about it. But make no mistake, while the British Raj is seen by British people as an exercise in power, to Indians you came as a bunch of idiots, and you left having learned very little about personal spiritual progress.

Now, Indians’ inner psyche tenders two options for dealing with the invader in their midst: (1) lose their advanced awakening state by mimicking the behaviour of the invader, and thus give up countless lifetimes of progress to accommodate and mirror the ignorance of the disdained and lowly invader, or (2) maintain their hard-earned advanced meditation status, and stay true to the ethos that is instilled in them from birth, namely, that each life has a purpose as well as its own reasoning complex.

And herein lays my current problem with Indians who land high positions in any given sector of a race-European institution. They attempt (very badly) to mimic race-European attitudes and behaviours. Their psyche counsels against this, which is why you often hear them exasperatedly proclaim that ‘the goras (whites) just don’t get it’. But regardless, these Indians continue to mimic the race-European. In doing so, they are forced into limiting their own ecological and spiritual solutions to the drive for enhanced productivity, where profits are not the sole criteria and responsibility to nature is paramount.

Take, for example, crime and punishment. Prior to the annex of Panjab, and India in general, the concept of theft didn’t exist. Sikhism and its kingdom was founded upon the concept of no wrong-doing at a personal level, such that even a murderer was exempt from prison but was made to work on his emotional state while working and living within the community. In the same historical period, people were hung for stealing an apple or a loaf of bread in Britain. Imprisonment without trial was unheard of in non-Muslim India and during the Sikh Raj of Panjab; whereas in Britain people were thrown in dungeons without trial for the most frivolous of reason.

Indians in the UK police force must bring the Indian mindset and viewpoint to bear on tackling crime here. So, for example, a person driving over the speed limit on a clear motorway should not be penalised, since nobody other than the driver and/or car occupants are affected. This is the kind of common-sense and humanity-based approach that Indian police officers should strive to instill in the police force, rather than mimicking their race-European colleagues. They must become vocal about applying commonsense interpretations and judgments when dealing with an incident.

The problem with breaking a problem down into it core elements, rather than taking a holistic and contextual approach, is that humans end up treating each other like machines.

We are not machines.

We require laws that reflect humanity, and human subjectivity in all matters. English law is geared for organizing society like a machine whose parts must be kept in good working order, but which is automated and un-human. It accepts only right or wrong; there is no grey area. This is perfect for running and maintaining an automated production line, but not for dealing with humans.

My call to Indians – and indeed other races – is not to mimic race-Europeans. You may think that in doing so you’re on a fast-track to equality. But as I argued in my previous post on female empowerment, equality is a nonsense; dignity must be the aim of all.

I leave you with one question – and be honest with yourself when answering: Precisely how materially and spiritually evolved do you think race-Europeans, including Anglo-Saxons, can possibly be after four hundred years and counting of killing darker skin-toned people across the globe?

And you want to be equal with them?!

No, me neither.

MYTH: UK’S INTEGRATION HYPE INCITEMENT TO MURDER

Having lived in the United Kingdom for over 50 years I thought I had seen all the good, bad and ugly that Great Britain has to offer. Yet since the mid-70s I have held the view that I am living in the UK on borrowed time, as integration is solely dependent on the indigenous people’s willingness to allow dignified cultural and religious disparity to take place while maintaining equal access to resources and amenities for all.

I recall vividly the degrading and disgusting names Sikhs were called regarding their turban, as well as in reference to their brown colour skin and their consumption of garlic, onion and ginger-enriched food.

In those days, out of sheer politeness and maturity in the face of what they recognised as the retarded mentality of the locals, the Asians in the UK kept their opinions about the natives to themselves.

Then race laws were introduced, banning racist references. Equality became enshrined in law. Cooperation and coexistence seemed feasible and, on the whole, tolerance, understanding and mutual appreciation evolved over the ensuing decades.

On 7th Oct 2017, I ventured into the social media platform of Facebook for the first time. Using a photo of myself and an Indian nickname that also sounded a tad anglicized, I joined several groups. One of these was called “ALL JOKES, ONE LINERS AND GREAT GAGS WITH REASONABLE ADMIN”. The group had 18,600 members, made no bones about the fact that it was a hard-hitting, over-the-top, no-holds-barred, adult humour group. I was happy joining since my humour and second-rate wit can on most occasions hold their own; and of course, the group wasn’t likely to throw anything at me that I had not heard before. Approval to join the group came through and I began to read the posts.

As promised, the FB group was hyper-racist, homophobic and misogynist to the core. Reference to female genitalia was an accepted and standard norm in the construction of any given sentence by the contributors, who were white men. I only came across two women: one with a sensible, middle-of-the-road humour and wit, and the other engaging in badly disguised full-on race hatred.

I introduced myself to the group, my profile image visibly establishing me as a Sikh gentleman with a full grey beard and a white turban. I wrote that I had already heard most, if not all, of the stuff they were likely to hurl at me, and that rest assured I would give as good as I got.

Right from the start, my religion and turban were targeted. Indeed, an initial remark used the exact same wording we Sikhs used to hear in the 1960s. This means that although racism was successfully removed from open public dialogue decades ago, it has been passed down the generations, from great-grandfathers through to great-grandchildren. Without hesitation, I retorted with a frank put-down, which silenced the guy who made the racist remark. He never made a comment to me again. I, in my social media naivete, thought he had gone on holiday until I was told he had blocked me. It became clear to me that I was dealing with grown men who could dish it out but became cry babies when it came to taking it.

Generally, I would make an observation, draw people into responding, and then fend them off with a sophisticated put-down, leaving a third person who was observing the exchange to smile and ask the other person, ‘What does it feel like to be played?

Rather than take it all in good grace, once the members of the FB group realised I could match their observational humour, the gloves came off. Explicitly degrading and disgusting religious, racial, cultural and dietary remarks came thick and fast.

By this time, I was on my third day into this experience. Concerned that there were zero non-white contributors, I scoured the list of group members and found pages and pages of people with African and Southeast Asian images and names – who had never participated in the group at all and seemed, to all intents and purposes, to be fake accounts. They were a front for the UK natives to spout their vitriolic race-hatred could flourish unbounded. The penny dropped that this was the real underbelly of the ordinary natives of Great Britain: their race hatred had flourished throughout the decades, and been passed down through the generations. It did not begin with Brexit.

The attacks on me by members of the FB group became more personal and direct. Seven days later, I decided to write my first post. I informed the group that in many cases their names, when translated into Asian languages, have explicit toilet meanings; and that they, like the rest of the animal world, have disgusting body odour, bad breath and stinky homes. In fact, if they were to meet an honest South-east Asian, this person would tell them that the average European’s freshly-washed smell is like sick.

Well, I could not believe it, my post disappeared. I inquired about what had happened to it. Terrance Ward, one of the group administrators, wrote back: ‘Didn’t you get the message?’ ‘What message is that?’ I asked in all innocence. I had been blocked. Given that the FB group was advertised as an adult, no-holds-barred humour group and its members posted the same, why block me when I had suffered a whole gambit of racial, cultural, religious and dietary abuse?

I left it there, trying to see the funny side of the group’s hypocrisy. My last exchange with them was on 13th October 2017.

Since then, I and my 70 yr old sister have suffered an onslaught of race-hate intimidation, leaving both of us in no doubt that we, and especially me, are going to be killed. The type of race-hate that was the norm in the 1960s is alive and well in our locality. All the Anglo-Saxons of our area check out the car when we are out driving, then the car registration number, and me with my white turban. In the initial days following the final denouncement of my FB group experience, a volley of venomous racial abuse spewed from their mouths. The underlying violent intent was immediately evident, and required only a trigger to be unleashed.

We reported the matter to the police. They noted the details of our case and our genuine belief that we are going to be murdered. The local community police officers contacted us subsequently, and set in motion the requisite procedures.

Like all people, our days follow a set itinerary. It is incredibly easy to log our movements and target us. Thus, regardless where we travel in our locality we are targeted. They, the rednecks, work in teams via multimedia mobile phones: logging the time they see us, they pass the message onwards about the direction we’re traveling, and as soon as we reach a certain landmark another two lookouts are already there waiting to check us out and pass the information further down the line. This has now translated into the message going out to a collective and who-so-ever thereafter notices us feeds back our movement information.

We take photos of them, and their car registrations numbers. WE HAVE THE NAMES AND PHOTOS OF THE CONTRIBUTORS FROM THE FACEBOOK GROUP “ALL JOKES, ONE LINERS, AND GREAT GAGS WITH REASONABLE ADMIN”… AND WE WILL NOT HESITATE TO PUT THESE ONLINE ACROSS SEVERAL MEDIA SITES IN ORDER TO OUT THESE RACIST PSYCHOPATHS.

Now, the question for Anglo-Saxons is this: If you, the indigenous can dish out racist toilet humour then how come you guys can’t take it?

All of a sudden the British bulldogs have turned into pussies? Integration and tolerance means verbal abuse is a two-way street. But for you Anglo-Saxons it just seems to mean that you get to rant, rave, and blame ‘others’ for everything without showing any modicum of maturity. You dish out abuse but can’t take the truth that comes your way. And an inferiority complex and low self-esteem leads you to kill rather than accept that, to others, perhaps your names do reference toilet habits, and you do smell.

You’re a race of psychopaths.

The media who represent you – e.g. The Daily Mail, The Daily Express and a selection of LBC radio presenters – should do the honourable thing for once and publicly announce what you and they really believe: that integration is bullshit (before returning to their usual racial venom).

Because real integration means that if you’re going to indulge in degrading racial abuse towards others, you have to accept the same back.

Bandi Chor – Divali

Until very recently, the late 20th century to be exact, Divali was celebrated by Sikhs in the same manner as Hindus. Divali, in fact, is a very old tradition that pre-dates the Vedas – recalling a time where Arya, coming from India, had dominion over the planet and indeed the solar system.

So it was deeply saddening to see ardent Sikhs desperate to make the Hindu (Indian) government see sense, and stop them labeling everyone a Hindu…a term which is now publicly acknowledged by Hindu academics to be a far worse pejorative than the ‘N’ word of north America, as it was used by Arabs and Persians to denote dwellers of old India prior to and after its conquest.

That the federal states of the Arya landmass stretched from Iceland to Moscow and from the top of Scandinavia to the north of Africa, and incorporated countless countries, languages, cultures, and independent histories that at times have been interwoven, does not mean that Hindus can now claim all dwellers within the artificial federal collective are Hindu…as if retrospectively adding Sikhs into the Hindu mix could repair the latter’s utter lack of self-worth and add a glamorous component.

It is the Hindu lack of self-worth that has led the Hindu Government to insist that Sikh marriage is a Hindu ceremony, and that Sikh culture, linguistics, rites, rituals, spirituality and divinity are Hindu too. It is insulting, abusive, and hurtful, and irrational to claim that my unique separate identity makes me a Hindu.

Therefore, speaking from a platform of free education and unfettered by Sikh material research, I can fully understand the Sikh demand for separation from the Hindu Government. Just to avoid the pain of being labelled Hindu, Sikhs have developed an entirely new – incorrect – calendar, attached to a solar cycle that utterly goes against the writing of their Guru Granthsahibji.

In their bid to escape the stigma of false identification as Hindu, Sikhs have also evolved a separate Divali festival. Divali for Sikhs now stands for freedom from oppression and incarceration. It has become rooted in the story of an illegally incarcerated person’s selfless demand to accept amnesty only if the same were extended to his fellow political prisoners. His jailor agreed that anybody who could hold on to his clothing would be freed along with him.

The innovative Sikh prisoner requested fresh clothes to wear ahead of his release from his lengthy prison sentence. His fellow Sikhs arrived with a newly sewn coat, which as his fellow prisoners gathered to bid him farewell they were encouraged to hold onto. Fifty-two prisoners were thus granted freedom.

How was this possible?

The Sikh prisoner requested that fifty-two very long tails be sewn into the coat’s natural design.

This Sikh is non other than the sixth Sikh Guruji, Guru Hargobindji; and his jailor Emperor Jahangir. The fifty-two prisoners released with him were royal heads of states. Some of their descendants went on to play a pivotal behind-the-scenes role in India’s independence.

The prison where Guruji was held was located in a garrison town called Gwalior, about 800km south of Amritsar. His journey back to Amritsar would have taken him anywhere from 80 to 100 days, whether on horseback or on foot. He would have traversed a mostly jungle- but also hilly terrain, marked by dirt roads in the best case scenario; and his entourage would have swelled and dwindled along the way, as it passed through various villages and towns.

Guruji’s estimated arrival in Amritsar would have been mid to late January. The event itself would have been marked with a comprehensive diva-lit welcome as was, and remains, the tradition of India.

Thus, for Sikhs, Divali is a longer event than just a one day festival. It begins at Divali as we generally know it, and culminates on the night of Guruji’s arrival at Darbarsahibji, Amritsar – a date which the panth through its research must eventually decide upon, and which will in future years herald the end of the Sikh celebrations of Divali.

Sikh Turban, Women & Dasam Granth

The turban of old signified authority, supreme evolved thought, balanced judicial judgment, chivalry, integrity, gallantry, graciousness, politeness, honesty, and deference to higher authority and thought.

In the same way that the system of female global leadership, supported by male life-partners, fell into disarray, so the prestige of the turban fell from grace… until the Sikh elite (the Khalsa) was formed and made to bear secular responsibility.

Following the last evolutionary realignment, seers and sants were unequivocally instructed to shed their aloof dispositions, and instead live their lives of advanced awareness while also fully participating in the secular world, lest their spiritual progress be permanently stopped. This strata of the secular sant is embodied in the Khalsa – the elite of advanced awakening.

The first five Khalsa were beheaded. They lay prone, until Guriji fused together heads and bodies (not in their original configurations, it should be noted) and administered amrit, produced and infused with female energy via Mataji. The beheaded came back to life. But they were not yet invested with the ethical responsibility required of them and that was to be part of their hyphenated secular-spiritual existence moving forward.

The investiture of secular roles and responsibilities for the Khalsa came in the form of the five articles of faith. The first of these, unshorn hair, signifies creation, which is protected and celebrated by the five-metre long male turban and the three-metre long female chunni. The male turban and the female chunni are therefore one and the same.

The turban signals to others that the wearer is ready to defend and protect the weak and oppressed; and women need only wear the turban if no men are available to carry out their responsibility, and only in a context of war and hand-to-hand combat.

For a woman to wear a turban outside of these conditions is an insult to men; it questions the latter’s capacity to fulfill their secular responsibility and it casts aspersions on their valour.

‘Educated’ Sikhs, however, have argued that the turban may be worn by women as well as men. Indeed, they positively demand this ‘freedom’, stating that Guruji instructs the very same. Their claim refers to a poem written by one of the Gurujis. Now, poems as we know are full of metaphor and allegory. They are artistic productions in which poets – like the particular Guruji noted here, who wrote fluently in five languages – take liberties with language to produce certain lyrical and rhythmic effects. And when rendering this in multiple languages… well, we all know the innate untranslatability of words across different languages… then the task becomes one of reaching for a sense and meaning that fits with that language.

So, those who call upon the particular poem in question here to support their claim and ‘right’ for females to wear the male turban, and who see in the poem an injunction to do so, in fact see nothing of the poem beyond their own imperfect interpretation – itself a dynamic product of their individual, social, cultural, political and ideological milieu. To fully know the poem, they really ought in fact to master poetry and the five languages in which Guruji wrote – leaving their own literal reading of the poem, which reflects nothing more than their own desires, at the door.

An important point here: the poem is attributed to a particular Guruji despite being penned in a language whose vocabulary and syntax made use of diacritical marks that post-date the Guruji. This along with several individual theses, pothis and books was eventually brought together into a single volume in 1890. This volume is the Dasam Granth. It contains Jaap Sahibji and Benti Chaupeeji – both of which are inaccurately attributed to Guru Gobind Singhji. These poems (for they are not banis) were subsequently integrated into morning and evening Sikh prayers – confusing and needlessly so.

The alleged poetry by Guru Gobind Singhji forms part of the Dasam Granth and sits side by side with poetry that embellishes eroticism, including BESTIALITY, along with five extremely erotic practices written in detailed pornographic terms alongside mantric and tantric material (which would include kundalini yoga). The entire volume appeals neatly to those within Hinduism who are on the cusp of leaving it in dissatisfaction, and who are mesmerised by the pure subjective Sikhism of Sri Guru Granth Sahibji. And in this volume, long hair or a full untrimmed beard is not a prerequisite; however, ‘keski’ the smaller under-turban, is sanctioned. Based on this misinterpretation contained in Dasam Granth indication is apparently given to wear a turban as one of the five Ks instead of hair – or so it is argued by the likes of the Akhand Kirtani Jatha amongst others. In that case, bestiality is also acceptable, is it?

It is a red herring to assume that the term ‘Dasam’ invokes Guru Gobind Singhji’s authorship of the material contained therein. Sikhs have been thrown, and erroneously shepherded, into this assumption because the word is associated with the number 10, and of course Guru Gobind Singhji was the tenth Guruji. Not wishing to dishonour the elaborate work of Dasam Granth, the Sikh hierarchy gave the publication respect, as they would any other scripture. This accommodation then became the platform for the dissatisfied exiting Hindus into Sikhism to argue in favour of the alleged poems of Guru Gobind Singhji to be formally included into the mainstream Sikh prayers.

One has to consider the period in which this took place. Sikhs had faced an almost total wipeout, with more than forty percent of its population killed during two encounters against an overwhelming army. Thus, any new recruits into Sikhism were positively welcomed, and they held sway. It was a pivotal moment, therefore, when compromises were made including acknowledging the alleged poem – that is the crux of the argument by those favouring female turban-wearing – by Guru Gobind Singhji as a formal bani. In the case of Jaap Sahibji and Benti Chaupeeji, once these attained bani status their integration into formal morning and evening prayers was a mere formality. Unfortunately, until Sikh authority does not officially rescind the Dasam Granth banis to their original status as poetry, their controversial use and attribution remains.

Reverting….

The second point: the saddest part is loyalty to a thought, and inability to give up a cherished ideal, such as that of the under-turban as the formal arbiter of Sikh identity.

Additionally, why, I ask (up to this moment in time), are Sikh women using a literal (mis)reading of a poem to configure their self-worth around the right to wear the turban in place of the chunni, or even – as is happening – underneath it? Why adopt a form of purdah whose removal Guru Nanakdevji was pivotal in championing along with other freedoms and respect for women?

Guru Nanakdevji successfully championed the thought that only a free and trusted woman was capable of giving birth to a child born into freedom of thought and freedom from a slave mentality. Indeed, only with a woman’s permission could a child, especially a boy, be born. He maintained that women, of all races, ought to be responsible for their own sexuality and sense of sexual integrity. He impressed upon Sikhs that men had possessions, and women belongings; and that no man possessed the women in his life, but that they belonged to these women.

Guru Nanakdevji impressed about Sikhs that man is answerable to woman, not the other way around. It may often look like women take a back seat in public and let men run the show; but in Sikhism, ultimate authority lies with women.

So, why, I ask as a Gursikh who takes pride in dressing as chicly as possible, do exquisitely beautiful Sikh women feel the need to emulate men, and forego their natural beauty as women?

The very purdah that Guru Nanakdevji fought to bring you out of, you are now throwing back in his face. You are hell-bent on assuming the Muslim woman’s head-to-toe covering – yet, the Sikh fought to free women in India from slavery and from the religious injunctions of successive empires. Now, living in a free land, you chuck the valour and deaths of your ancestors back into their faces.

In times to come, medical procedures will make surgically attached fully-functioning penises available – will you demand those too, in order to feel fully human? It is not Sikhism which maintains gender inequality – but you are using Sikhism as the battleground for fighting the hierarchies and inequalities of the world around you…. and unfairly so.

Look to Sikhism. Understand that therein women are regarded as life’s teachers; men as life’s students. A man, having reached the highest echelons of inner awareness possible for man, can only aspire to the next layer of progress if he is born into the female phenomena. That is, man has to be born as woman in order to evolve further. This is a highly simplified version of a deeply complex, sometimes contradictory and confusing system, so I am keeping it simple… but consider this: religion tends to focus on men rather than on women, on teaching men of the faith rather than women.

As I said: women are life’s teachers; men, life’s students.

And yet, here you are – so many of you Sikh women today – fighting for a right to be like your men, when you’re already so much more advanced than them. But, go on, please, trample over all the hard-won struggles of your forbears in the Sikh faith, seek out turbans today, penises tomorrow.

Sister/Brother responsibility, India style: “RAKHRI”

Psychically, women are superior to men and embody considerateness, forgiveness, and tolerance. However, at the conscious level – a level that cannot unmask the psychic layer – it is the brute strength of man that dominates. Men are rustic, manual, multi-dimensionally unskilled, emotionally limited, and bereft of inter-personal skills

Thus, in marriage and cohabitation, whether arranged or love-based, women always accommodate male intrusion and direction.

The situation is more marked for young girls who are married off. A young girl married off into a new setting, a new environment, a new family structure is at the bottom of that family’s pecking order in every way. She is, to all intents and purposes, defenceless and powerless.

To balance this inequality, a mature thought-based mechanism was put in place, whereby a woman’s opinions and thoughts could be represented by a male who had known her since childhood. The person had to be from her age group, and was usually her brother or her first male cousin.

The brother, acting both as his sister’s representative, and as his father’s ambassador, would appeal to his sister’s in-laws. If the appeal fell on deaf ears, then the woman’s paternal uncle’s would make the representation instead. And if that failed, then her father came and spoke privately to her husband’s father to resolve matters.

Representations and interventions by a woman’s paternal uncle signaled that the matter was serious. For her father to get directly involved signaled that the matter was nigh-on intransigent and insurmountable.

The role of the brother in assuming his sister’s or cousin-sister’s welfare is, by contrast, part of everyday social relationships. He counters his brother-in-law’s physical threat, safeguards his sister, acts as the link between two families, and assumes a critical role and set of observational responsibilities towards the welfare, rights and education of his sister’s children.

The day that commemorates this responsibility is called Rakhri, or Rakhari, or Raksha.

On this day, a sister ties a thick, symbolic, coloured cotton thread on her brother’s right wrist, and she feeds him barfi – a sweet made from milk, ghee, and honey/sugar. He in response, promises to protect and safeguard her interests in the coming year.

Originally, the promise took the form of a promissory note. In time, this was replaced by a nominal amount of money.

By the way, it is worth noting that Rakhri is not a Hindu festival. It is and always was a global, communal, mature, ancient festival that pre-dates the advent of Vedic concept.

The annual gesture of acknowledgement and promise, by sister and brother, indicates divine ethos and humanity. Arguably, a culture that finds such gestures inimical to their own belief degrades their own humaneness and divine connection. So, I ask those of you who are anti-brother/sister celebration of Rakhri – which this year took place on 7th August – what exactly is your problem???