The facebook inspired race hatred Anglo-Saxon with support from their fascists mainland European counterparts are still following me on their social media sites and ran another run in my local high street to see my reaction prior to an attack. This time I informed the police who I understand took decisive action. I thank the UK police for that. I am still capturing the faces of the individuals involved and will begin to post them online as race-hate fascists.

The Truth About Mary Magdalene: an exploration of ‘free’ will, morals, demons and mental illness

Mahatma Gandhiji said ‘reading the Sermon on the Mount gives me as much pleasure as reading the Gita.’

In this essay, I explore the Bible’s treatment of Mary Magdalene, but it is not my intention to rob you of the comfort, support and sustenance the Bible may provide you.

There are some points to note first, before I begin, which provide context to my assessment of, and argument against, the Bible’s characterization of Mary Magdalene. These are as follows:

Jesus, the person, lived several centuries earlier than indicated in biblical history.

His lifetime coincided with the global influence of Buddhism, and it is likely that he – and others of his ilk – would have studied eastern philosophy and made certain self-discoveries through that.

It follows, therefore, that Jesus most likely would never have uttered the statements attributed to him in biblical texts.

Thus, the Bible’s author/s can be said to have created a myth.

Biblical myth, like most other powerful myths, communicate core beliefs that permeate through folklore and storytelling across the ages. They draw on the past, and on real historical personages, and mythologise these.

One such historical figure would have been the real Jesus, who – like Buddhaji  – was  already a synonym for particular attributes and high-minded values at the time the Bible was written.

Hence, the Bible crystallizes an idea or concept and set of folkloric stories that have gathered force and come to assume a kind of powerful reality.

Taking all this into account, the story of Mary Magdalene’s interaction with Jesus of Nazareth, shines a light on the evolution of kinship, fellowship, and morality, and helps illuminate the theme and process of personal transformation. It does so, I would argue, in quite distinct ways from – and more accurately than – the Bible sets out.

In the Bible, Mary Magdalene is repeatedly described as a prostitute. However, since we know that she comes from a wealthy family, that simply isn’t possible in the terms that we understand prostitution today (and presumably at the time of the Bible’s authorship). 

For one thing, wealth confers a particular loosening of moral mores and restrictions  – just look at news about the elite in our society, and the almost self-congratulatory rite-of-passage they pass through: various addictions, affairs, etc. The uninhibited freedom of the wealthy elite is the same today as it has ever been.

Mary lived in a time of Roman occupation, and high-society would have mimicked Roman high-life, which in turn mimicked Greek high-life before it. This high-life would have comprised relaxed moral codes and sexual freedoms. In this context, Mary might conceivably have been a courtesan. This differs from prostitution in the sense that it centres on companionship as much as sex, on being an intelligent and witty person with whom to spend time, and being in some ways an equal partner in the interaction.

Given that her brother lived in a leper’s colony, Mary and her older sister would likely also have assumed the role and responsibility of the eldest male family member, meaning interacting with men as equals, and with candour and ease. Twinned with the promiscuity of the wealthy elite of whom she was herself a member, this potentially makes Mary a very unpalatable figure to the religious orthodox of her own time, and those who authored the Bible. 

Here was a woman embodying the liberal values and behaviours of high society, exhibiting tomboyish flamboyance, enjoying free interaction with men because of her responsibility – all of which coalesced to subject her to accusations of, and characterization as, a prostitute. Mary thus exemplified all that was pernicious, and was an affront to – the Laws of Moses and the Law of God. 

The case of her affair with an older married man with children was likely the perfect foil for making an example of Mary. In a sting set up by the Pharisees, which perhaps her lover colluded in, in exchange for everlasting anonymity, Mary was cast as the ultimate fallen woman.

But there was more at stake than Mary’s reputation – and her possible stoning to death. The Pharisees were also hell-bent on testing Jesus’ adherence to the Laws of Moses and the Law of God. 

I’m not necessarily talking about the real Jesus, who, as pointed out earlier, preceded the Bible by several centuries; but then, neither is the Bible referring to him per se, rather to the legend of Jesus, to a man with Jesus-like qualities.

So, what would Jesus do, when confronted with a fallen woman whose death was likely imminent because of her immoralities? In the Bible, he writes in the earth his condemnation of, as well as the hidden secrets of her accusers. As depicted in c.15th paintings, writing in the earth is akin to making a definitive statement, issuing a decree, it is what gives us the saying ‘written in stone’. The real Jesus’ interaction with eastern philosophy and its theatrical, allegorical, and allusive modes of delivering lessons makes it impossible to believe that he would ever have acted in such a way. It is inimical to the way in which people like us, people of our ilk, behave or communicate the god-concept.

What else does the Bible say about Mary Magdalene and Jesus? That she was possessed by no fewer than seven devils. (This number is interesting, as in other cultures the devil is associated with number nine, fifty-four, and even one hundred and eight). The devils made her act in the way she did; they made her promiscuous.  From an orthodox religious perspective, the flexible mores and conduct of the wealthy elite are indeed (then as now) anathema to living a moral and correct life in fear of god – they are considered to be under the influence and control of the devil.

The devil is a wonderful invention. – a placeholder and catch-all for all the actions and attitudes, the behaviours and beliefs that hard-right fanatics can’t fathom or explain, and which they don’t wish to try and understand or comprehend because doing so would dent their rigid exclusion of morals and logics other than their own.

But the devil concept is, in its reductiveness, singularly unhelpful.

Jesus, like others of our ilk, would have been vehemently dismissive of the devil concept. While publicly he would have assimilated himself to prevailing language and concept norms, he would have recognised that the ‘devil’ so-called was entirely irrelevant to explaining and resolving Mary’s situation.

Why? Because the devil concept rests on the assumption that a person has free will and a normative moral compass to begin with, and that bad and immoral behaviour results from this being perniciously thwarted. In fact, though, free will, reasoning and thinking are themselves complete fabrications. Which is to say, what comes across as our ‘free’ will is in fact already written into us: pre-ordained. 

It is difficult to explain this to laypeople. The pathway to understanding such things entails a process of pain that moves from one’s humiliation, through humility, humbleness, and passivity, before evolving into and merging with the potent vital energy: calmness. And no ascending soul (antrekarna) can make the journey alone, on its own merit and talent; it happens through the grace of a high being and only if one is selected to be given such grace.

Reverting…

So, Jesus knew that Mary’s fallen status was not due to devil possession, and was not a result of her own ‘free’ will as we understand it. Rather, she was pre-programmed by her own bio-chemistry to be the person she was, and to act as she did – that programming establishing itself before conception, crystallizing during gestation, and playing out in the course of her life and actions. Even with all this knowledge, how was he going to save her?

Jesus knew the matter pivoted not on Mary’s adultery per se, but on whether he was seen to uphold God’s law by denouncing her, and saving himself from being labelled a heretic.

It’s important to know here that those of us with psychic privileges have access to everybody’s past, present and future. We see the traps and the miseries that have befallen and will befall people. We see the liars, the deceitful, the haters; just as we see the innocent and the pious. We see the skeletons in everybody’s closet and their virtues. We hear their confessions, their secrets; we provide counsel, support. We are powerful, but we proceed delicately. Such would have been Jesus’ knowledge and role too.

 So, what did Jesus do? Well, for those of our ilk, the protection of the defenceless – with no thought for ourselves – is de rigeur. Jesus will have sought to protect Mary; not to hasten her death even if it meant his own. Jesus surveyed the bio-signature (not the same as the debunked concept of the ‘transient aura’) of each of Mary’s accusers, and without naming and shaming them, he made reference to their failings and their skeletons. Doing so causes perceptible changes in mannerism and mental outlook in the person who is being subtly told off, as I have found when deploying the same tactic. We know this tactic better through the now enduring soundbite: ‘let he who is without sin cast the first stone.’ So, Mary’s accusers were chastened by Jesus’ knowledge of their own wrong-doings, as the Bible reports.

The Bible also goes on to say that Mary asked for deliverance of her soul, that the devils possessing her were cast out, and her soul was able to move forward unencumbered. How we do make sense of this? On one hand, Mary’s bio-signature pre-determined her actions, so saved from one tragic situation it’s reasonable to assume that she would have reverted to type – to being the uninhibited person she was. We can think of it in terms of the analogy of the repeat offender.

But something did indeed change in Mary. What? How?

Well, she came into the conduction, convection and radiation range of a high being (a Jesus figure) and was enveloped in the latter’s psychic care and protection. This overwhelmed and reconfigured her own bio-structure, and established a bond between her and Jesus that would persist through multiple lifetimes. They would be inexorably drawn together each lifetime – she towards his charismatic protection; he towards the need to help emancipate and liberate her from the cycle of life and death.

What of the Bible’s depiction of how Mary reacted to being saved? It says she washed Jesus’ feet with her tears, and wiped them dry with her hair. At the time, the practice of kneeling down, bending forward, and touching one’s forehead to the feet of one’s saviour (or high being) was globally widespread (outside race-European environments and societies). So this likely is a true depiction of events. Where Mary dried Jesus’ feet with her hair, men would have done so with their beards.

Consequently, Mary would have become a silent observer at Jesus’ feet, a humble server, and a life-long student. Quietly and conscientiously.

What, you are wondering, has any of this to do with mental health? 

In contemporary Britian – and elsewhere in the West – Mary Magdalene’s bio-signature which pre-determined her behaviour, and which was misunderstood by the religious right as a manifestation of devil possession, would be cast as mental illness. Here was a woman with deep psychological problems, going back to childhood abandonment, mistreatment, abuse; which she perpetuated or reacted against by her own subconscious set of behaviours. 

In today’s mental health landscape, Mary would be prescribed psychotropic drugs to quell her nature, silence the demons, change her chemistry. But the Jesus figure of her time managed to ‘save’ her without resorting to drugs or causing disequilibrium to her internal organs. He extended her his psychic protection, and that altered her bio-structure so deeply and so effectively that she was, so to say, tamed, saved, a model citizen of the society she lived in. 

In contrast with the character of Mary Magdalene prior to her being ‘saved’, is the character of the lonely person, the social introvert. At different ends of the spectrum, they are both equally subject to being labelled mentally ill. 

Briefly: there is a world of difference between aloneness and loneliness. The former involves active enjoyment in being alone with one’s self, giving oneself over to contemplation, as a kind of pleasurable activity. For such people, the thrill of social engagement pales in comparison. It is a panacea they do not need, though they partake of it happily enough at times and with particular people. Their strength does not cohere in social settings, nor their enjoyment. Aloneness is a skill, but oftentimes just as much a need for people. 

Loneliness is the experience of aloneness as a form of unhappy isolation. Sociability is key to people who feel lonely; their sense of self, of inner stability and calm, dependent on others’ company. Their experience of aloneness as isolation consolidates it is their mind as a disease. For them, solace is other people. 

It is all too easy to teach that being alone with oneself is a mental health issue; such is the environment we live in today. But perhaps, as with Mary Magdalene, the trick is to take what is written, what is cast as normal and true, and explore what contexts and other realities that narrative – of the fallen woman, or of the lonely person – might be missing; and how the guidance of a high being can bring us to enhanced knowledge of what is in fact really going 

Colours: Birth & Death

The simplistic novelty of popular music theory ignores and then expels the status quo of the Seed-Notes. Then it replaces the core Seed-Notes with its own one-dimensional existence. Novelty inevitably and invariably changes the spiritual state of the core Seed-Notes. However, the change is artificial, transient, temporary and is cloaked in the ambiguities of ignorance; the prime secret uncared for, or glossed over. Popular musicians seemingly invoke originality, oblivious of the relationship between creation and the rule of the ‘unstruck melody’. The very melody without which, the creation of creations could not be.

Light, in similar manner, is in fact the co-element of the unstruck melody.

Suffice to say, at this level, that they are twins, though deeper dialogue would reveal another truth-reality. Light that I refer to is not the type of light registered by the ocular apparatus. For example, the night sky, the very blackness where the full moon is ploughing ground further afield, that very blackness is in fact unbelievably bright and is in fact light, pure light at that. But human eyes are not required to operate at that end of the spectrum, so our limited vision registers it as darkness.

However, light at its base gross level, with its manual colours, we recognise. The colour of flowers, dyed clothes and everything in nature, classified in colour, humans deem to be the sum total of the light spectrum.

Colours represent stages of advancement, functionality and purpose. For example, two different machines, a car and a boat, cannot operate in each other’s environment. Colours in the same way have a purpose, and their resonance within that colour configuration has a defining rationale.

Each of us at after birth, prior to the ability to focus our eyes, cognizes our attachment or preference to one particular colour. That colour is our homing signal. Our solar-signature. The core of our being is that very colour. It is our ‘solar-handle’. It is what defines us. However, each colour has its own individual bar code and is attached to other colours forming a unique colour scheme. This colour scheme defines our existence, our vibration, our harmonious or disharmonious relationships within so-called social structures and interpersonal relationships. And this solar-signature is what precipitates the initial fertilisation, the union between the ovum and the sperm. More about the intricate relationship of solar-signature in another essay.

Now let me put the cat amongst the pigeons.

Say that the initial colour is yellow. Two new-born babies could be attracted to the same colour. However the pattern alignment of the other colours (and I am going to limit this to the conscious colours of the rainbow only, when in fact the range of colours beyond the conscious layer has numerous distinct colours, and these have nothing to do with mixing the colour palate) attached to the preferred yellow will always be different. For one baby, red might be the next colour attached to the initial yellow, while for the other it could be blue.

The balance and the cooperation between the colour vibrations sums you up as the individual. You in fact are light. But in ignorance you are deemed only a physical corporeal body. And no, purity, normally associated with the pious and imagined to be a pure colour of one hue or another, is not a uniform reality either: for, when the combination of the notes from the initial unstruck melody and the apex colour of an individual are not in synchronization…one cannot appreciate the ‘play’ behind creation.The apex colour of an individual person, if it is to aid the individual into deeper clearer awareness, has to be harmoniously aligned with all the colours encapsulated and vibrating within a physical frame.

Hence, in all my writings, my insistence on calling each individual a bio-system.

However, there are basic laws, such as the founding stone of the colour symmetry. These founding stones are not limited to the seven colours of the rainbow, but to at least two more. In addition to the seven rainbow colours, we have to add white and black. Thus, we have nine colours. And these nine colours correspond to the main nine chakras of the given bio-system. (I have written about chakras in a previous essay). Furthermore, the current format of allocating a particular colour to a particular chakra – of course this only applies to the seven chakras – is not cast in stone either. Thus, the confusion among the ‘experts’ who teach further awareness, and who have an unbelievably limited understanding of how the mechanism of the inner bio-system actually functions…all of that is for another essay.

Reverting. The core base colours are limited to three: black, white and red. Here, red represents the opening of the portal of colour configuration itself. Black and white represent certain limiting environments and administration centres. Black and white are the polarities that indicate the type of awareness one is involved in and attached to.

Within these two polarities exists the following: You enter a state through a portal. This portal is the emergence portal. The presence of the emergence portal decreases fast as you move away from it towards the convergence portal, and thence to the progressive dimension. The area within the emergence and convergence portal is the arena that You exist in, and is denoted by the colour Red.  The emergence portal is referred to as Black, only because once out of that you are not allowed to identify or distinguish it from its surroundings. The ongoing target destination, however, is the convergence portal, which in relative terms shines and is therefore referred to as White.

The bio-structure is housed between the energies of the emergence portal located at the lowest confluence of a bio-structure and the convergence portal located at the apex chakra of a bio-structure. Thus, the arena of the remaining seven chakras is reactive, and referred to as Red. This Red represents activity and is split into the seven colours of the rainbow. Having said that, this arena and its colour symmetry is not as straight forward as I have explained. That for another time.

Emerging Portal – Black

Black represents retrograde awareness. It exists only because its other presence exists. The other presence is shining, labeled white, denoting expansion and/or explosion. Indistinguishable matter labeled black represents negativity, regressiveness or implosion. For purposes of explanation I too, at times, use extreme terms like negative and positive awareness. When, in reality, that is not factually accurate. However, advancement in negative awareness is equally powerful as that of positive awareness.

If the Master-Being of blackness stood before your secular bio-awareness, you would be extremely hard pressed to differentiate between it and the Master-Being of whiteness. They are identical in their power and kindness. The purity of the two, experienced at a secular level, is identical. Only at the advanced level are we able to differentiate between them. It is only then that we are able to determine that one environment is absolutely reliant for its existence upon the presence of the other. In this case, regressive presence in order to exist needs the progressive presence. At this level suffice to say that progressive presence can, however, exist of its own accord.

[In reality, the two states are neither progressive (white) nor repressive (black). White refers to expansion, as in inhaling to puff the cheat. Black refers to exhaling and deflating the chest.]

In everyday existence, a strong association with the colour black means that you, the bio-system, are the pawn of its Master-Being (in English, the Devil) who is your ‘God’ and who you consider to be the ultimate God-creator. Therefore, at funerals, when as mourners you wear black, you are stating that the person you have come to cremate or bury was a pawn of the Devil, as are you; and you thereby willingly accept the deceased’s negative qualities into yourself. Thereafter, this negative quality is passed through you to your partner and offspring the moment you meet them.

It is like wearing, as people do in western culture, the wedding ring on the very hand that you use to wipe your bottom. It is asking Black and Devil to be the guardian of your relationship. Fingers are the expulsion outlets of bio-energy from your bio-system. A malfunction restrictor, such as a ring, is expressly used to control the excessive loss of energy, or to enhance the methodical expulsion of a particular energy from the bio-system. The best place to wear an ornament if one must be worn to identify a relationship, is above and never below the heart chakra.

Black is the colour of the Devil and his mistress Evil.

Converging Portal – White

White represents a new beginning. And all beginnings start as a null and a void. A bud waiting to bloom. This colour represents the nest positive expression of creation. The Master-Being of this environment is God and his mistress Nature-Mother. White is the environment, both the end of one dimension, one layer, one existence and opening portal to the next. It is inert. To attach your emotion to this colour, for example at a Christian wedding and marriage, is to claim that the relationship is inert and non-committal, albeit that the passion and lust of the relationship is anything but inert and passive.

White should only be worn at funerals or religious functions. White also indicates that your emotional rationality is balanced and steady, and additionally that you are looking or aiming in your life to progress through a positive energy portal. And this also avoids you taking home, to your nearest and dearest, any negative energy of the deceased, when worn at funerals.

Operational Field – Red

Red represents the rainbow. Red represents active, directional, thoughtful progression in respect of the parameters of nature. Red is therefore the colour of marriage, or of a new relationship. Red is also the colour of financial well-being and accumulation of wealth. Hence, from red, movement takes place in co-operation with one’s own birth colour symmetry. In addition, red is the arena that allows the flow of the other colours associated with the seven (normal) chakras. That flow is controlled by the birth bar-code symmetry attained at conception, which then regulates the actual moment of birth.

You are born at conception. It is that moment that decides your totality henceforth. Red is the entry portal of your personality. However, you will be attracted to a given colour other than the red that facilitates your entry into the world. That colour is your bio-solar-signature.

Along with that colour, at conception, you are also a Tone. A note. A note that is part of the unstruck melody. You resonate that note. That note could be harmonious, meaning it bonds easily with other notes to make an expanding sound. Or, you could be the note that is seldom used and usually stands alone in its initial pure configuration.

Humans see and draw the wrong conclusions from social interaction: your popularity is a measure of how well you are liked and admired and how often your company is sought. This is fantastic for your ego, but in terms of allowing you advancement into deeper refined awareness it is the very opposite of what you need. Compared to this is the individual who is least liked, seldom sought, usually ignored and generally looked down upon. The social outcast. This person has the best configuration for advancing further and deeper into self-awareness.

But when ignorance felicitates ignorance then of course the retrograde awareness reaps rewards. And retrograde awareness is the worship of the Devil. And if that is what has been prescribed for you then that is what you will participate in. After all, we cannot all become detached and materially reclusive. Although I accept that it is the best thing, and know that all advanced persons are detached and materially reclusive, you secular beings are not configured for that type of thought and alignment. For you, insatiable materialism is the order of the day. And I have to respect that.

For you, too, are the Seed-Note. And your Seed-Note is popularism. Like popular music, based on two, three or the maximum four notes repeatedly played in a sequence to make music, you too have a function and a reason. So enjoy your participation as a cog in the scheme of things. For you are created for a reason, and only reason knows its Reason. As for the rest of us, we need to sit back and participate as cogs, by playing our own part, in the scheme of things.

Pandora’s Box

Sex and the Planet

From the Northern European Plain to the Plain of France, crisscross many grand majestic rivers. In the east, the Volga and Dnieper hold sway while the Danube, Reine, and Seine flow to their rest into the surrounding salty sea. Drinkable water eventually merges into undrinkable water.

At the foothills of the Matterhorn run a selection of crystal clear mountain streams. You can stand in awe of how pure the water appears. Yet, ask any local and they will inform you how poisonous the water is. Why? Because it is enriched with heavy industrial metals spewed out by the mega-intensive industrial furnaces. These furnaces are located from the Northern European Plain all the way to the Plain of France.

However, water for human consumption is removed from the majestic rivers, filtered, treated with more chemicals, and finally pumped to homes.

Moving on, do an Aunty (my name for the internet) search (oh, by the way my name for computers is ‘fruit-machines’) and seek out images of the vast miles and acreage of floating debris covering the planet’s soul, her Seas. The very life-gift of the planet is being progressively poisoned by organic chemistry via synthetic and polymer plastics.

Millennia before the popular advent of carbon chemistry, alchemy was secreted in the planet’s philosophical influences and forgotten traditions. This was taken into the industrial age where copious and far more poisonous compounds were created.

But that wasn’t enough. The battle for racial supremacy demanded a far more lethal and fatal weapon. The atomic bomb was re-invented without any of its original failsafe components in place.

Just prior to the atomic bomb one race reached out in its desire for domination, and copying from the ancient Indian scriptures it manufactured an incredible instrument of fear. The V1 and V2 rockets rained down on the British Isles.

Naturally, the progression of ignorance means we now await the power of the V2 technology harnessed in tandem with the nuclear technology, and then the Europeans will successfully travel the solar system at speeds unheard of as yet. Wonderful, no?!

The V2 technology has already progressed into cruise missiles and drones, albeit the fanfare ought to go to the satellite rockets (descendents of the V2 rockets) taking a payload to neighboring celestial globes. The natural progression of this technology meant unmanned flying apparatus would carry out set functions – remote killing.

We have already seen the next stage of this ignorant-technology whereby an ‘imprisoned’ political leader was, having given up armed struggle to free his occupied land, ‘cooked’ using microwave technology. Prior to his death, he behaved like someone who had lost his marbles. The ongoing squabble about his death – did he die from one or other of the nuclear elements injected into him – just diverts us, obscuring the real cause of his death. This microwave technology is going to mean that areas of urban habitation will be ‘fried’ using outer space based satellites bouncing ground-based initiator beams.

I am associated, as a minor field functionary, with a body that is charged with the responsibility of controlling human ventures, lest humans fragment this planet. Our Seniors have stepped in to safeguard this planet by wiping humans off the face of it if necessary, using complicated and unbelievably advanced telekinetic equipment, and then resetting the global environment ‘back by many millions of years’ so the entire shooting match can begin all over again.

This planet is at the edge of a non-descript galaxy in an isolated barren area of the cosmos; but this planet is all we have. There is no other like it out there. Well, not within the means of current technology. And if the current activity of deep earth excavation for her minerals, carbon, and precious gems does not stop, which those of my level consider to be the rape of this planet, then without warning the Seniors will reset the clock.

To put it simply, the very natural resources (being excavated) are the single reason why the sun’s damaging rays are deflected from frying all the living species on this planet. Humans can argue that all mineral resources are there for pillage, and then hope that once exhausted the technology is found to allow mass exodus from this planet and occupation of another world somewhere out there. Yes, fine, but what about the basic building blocks of life without which human life perishes? What happens to those?

Race Europeans have a highly selective, amnesiac, self-delusional over-appreciation of their own capabilities. Their type of delusional nonsense has been attempted in the past and will be opted for again in the future. But at each point, before irreparable damage is done to the self-sustainability of this planet, the Seniors have wiped selected or indeed whole human races off the face of this globe. No warning. Just a simple decision and the  button will be pushed. Minor culls of humanity have happened many a time. But a major wipe-out has happened only a few times in all three of the four Ages.

It is also true that the array of suns we see as stars are in fact reflective mirages, as very few suns actually exist in our own galaxy, and it has to be said that Albert Einstein and his colleagues have not yet got their finger on the pulse of that truth and its meaning.

All of this very basic information is contained in the various scriptures of the old India: Aryadesh, Nobleland.

These are the self-same scriptures now housed and digitalized by various governments that are trying to unlock and decode their content. Albert Einstein used an aspect of his minor inner awareness along with his intellect and his secular comprehension of the Torah to formulate his famous theory. But like all intelligent people, he missed the point. The point is that for all the knowledge and clear-cut intellect one very important ingredient is missing. That ingredient is kept shrouded, although it is available to all Sentient beings. What is it? Inner awareness.

We, from that old land of knowledge and inner awareness give indications, but the message is seldom understood. We shared the fun of gunpowder and the Europeans used it for destruction and domination. We shared the peaceful purpose of a wingless projectile along with details of its powering system, and the Europeans have partially used it for draconian domination having reasonably mastered the projectile but failed to unravel the powering system. We shared basic knowledge for a powerbase, only for the Europeans to use it to visit destructive and ongoing misery on other humans.

I, for one, had a say in opposing the dissemination of any further knowledge and guidance with the Europeans. Interestingly, they were utilising the genuine goodwill of the scripturally aware who come from a much lower stratum than the one my group occupies, to unravel the secrets of the wingless projectile’s powering system, but we have put a stop to that for the time being. This technology would have allowed humans to reach our nearest ‘star’ within ninety minutes or so; or, with even better understanding of the technology, to reach it within a matter of a few minutes.

So why did we stop the exchange of knowledge?

Information is not meant for domination and subjugation. As collective occupiers of this planet and the solar system, the responsibility for thoughtful and balanced guardianship demands that we examine each and every step of our attempts to ‘improve’ on nature.

Europeans have totally missed the point, in that ‘nature’ is itself the ultimate technology operating at its optimum best.

Nature has, in her databank, information of all past expressions of various global and celestial incidents and has an absolute awareness of what passes for the future. Europeans wander the globe unaware that the future is cemented in the same way that the past seems to them to be unchangeable. The future is not some unseen, irrational series of events. On the contrary, the future makes the past. Thus, the past plays itself out within parameters which are themselves pre-ordained by the future.

Unfortunately, the danger here is the Europeans’ ignorant desire to misunderstand the present and ignore the future while fattening their wealth. And it’s a wealth that will no more grant them a long, disease-free life than it will grant them access into the dominions through which the ‘soul’ can be made to escape this prison called earth. Ask yourself, do you want to move freely in the cosmos or do you want to restrict your adventures to environments where only an exact amount of earth-air exists?

Interstellar travel automatically involves the sentient beings’ ability to exist without the confines of the prison-earth environment. Imagine if fish could live outside water and be without gills. They too would roam the terra firma like us. Likewise, an ability exists to travel within this galaxy as her own ‘children’, but that ability requires a totally different approach by humans, especially the Europeans.

Aunty (internet) was devised by a need to share information amongst colleagues. Once again, ignorance ruled the need/desire and the end result is that now inhuman, affectionless, power-based, sex is rife and freely available over Aunty’s network. Aunty has been vulgarised and thoroughly violated. And as soon as one shocking activity becomes ‘normal’ then another sadistic vulgarity is streamed in order to sustain flagging hits of any given website. Congratulations for creating a tool to de-humanise women.

The very women without whom you as a man cannot be born.

Womankind is brutalised by mankind and subjected to violence and ongoing derogatory sexual practices which, if done in front of you to your own mother and daughters, would see you arming yourself to the teeth to kill the abuser. But hey, it’s ok to watch the same acts done to a woman with no family blood connection to you. The reality is, you are an equal participant of the abuse as the abuser themselves. Pat yourself on your back for becoming a groomer of sexual abuse.

Europeans fail to understand that each of us is a bio-signature, most compatible with a bio-signature whose resonance is similar to our own. Of course, there are exceptions to the rule. Those born with gay trig-mantra as their bio-signature ought to be duly respected and allowed to function within their own bio-field.

However, bio-fields have porous membrane. The bio-field emits and receives ‘information’ that affects and changes the bio-signature’s perception levels. The bio-field does not have a moral or ethical compass as practiced by functioning societies. It simply gathers, absorbs, and transmits information.

Thus, the capacity to function and interact with other humans means that your own bio-field is saturated and laden with what in human terms passes for negative templates. For whatever reason, as an example, the race European world seeks and participates in numerous sexual encounters, thus poisoning their own bio-field and passing that poison-laden bio-signature to their descendents. A poisoned bio-field has an automatic built-in trigger that functions as an aberration of humanity’s norms and turns it, per the example we are using of perverse sexual behaviour, into the accepted and normative template. We know that sexual intrigue is an inescapable fact of life; but it need not be put into practice as a lifestyle.

I lived on three continents during my childhood. The third was Europe. On each of those continents, children’s natural curiosity for exploration involved physical sexual exploration. Kids played games like ‘mummies and daddies’ and ‘doctors, nurses and patients’. The games were a cover and excuse for our curiosity to examine the physical anatomy of the other sex. But these games were played within our own age group.

This sexual curiosity evolved with age into being attracted to an older person. And each, within the group I grew up with, had a tale to tell about such encounters. But it was a mutual-appreciation venture. All older people were by no means attracted into this, just as all the people I grew up with have not indulged in such activity with a younger age group.

I, of course, as detailed in a previous post, went to very heights of sexual awareness and was tutored in that environment to understand sexual triggers and how to coordinate the chemical/desire paradigm as opposed to being a pawn within it.

Thus, the current fashion of seeking retribution for having been groomed as if you were an unwilling participant in the process is an indicator of a poisoned bio-field in operation. Because, had the initial bio-field integrity remained unsoiled then the chance of being groomed would not have increased.

As an old old fashioned Sikh, I have absolutely zero tolerance for the abuse of kids by adults. Those adults should be hounded into submission. That type of interaction is utterly unacceptable.

You also have to realise that you are the sum total of your parents’ attitude and hidden desire at your inception, which then is registered in you as your normal template. This is where bio-signature is of vital importance and plays a significant part in how you perceive associations with others and external impulses. This manifests in the following way: a compromised bio-signature would lean at its subconscious level towards an environment where an abuser could groom that bio-signature.

Why?

Because an adult enjoying free, irresponsible, unattached sex means imbues the bio-signature of their offspring with every ounce of their own desire, ambition, anticipation, and sexual indulgence. You as the parent are therefore equally responsible for the predator who takes advantage of your teenage child.

Because your behaviour has influenced the tolerance threshold of that teenage child into assuming that it can accept, participate and indulge in the invitation-seduction it is being charmed with. This is why older civilisations are relentlessly strict about social behaviour and interaction between teenage/young adults and adults.

What you sow, your offspring will pay for.

Having said that, look at the morality and ethics of sex and relationships.

In my childhood, I was fully conversant with male gay sexuality. They were called homosexuals then. We kids picked up the terminology from the older kids. Female gay sexuality was not openly spoken about but we assumed it existed. And, yet, adult males were also frequently seen walking hand in hand as an expression of trust and of friendship that went deeper than blood-brother relationship. Such examples of men walking hand-in-hand or indeed women walking hand-in-hand were never considered sexual. It never was sexual.

Youths of opposing gender could walk hand in hand, albeit only up to a certain age after which was frowned upon. Occasionally, parents walked hand-in-hand with their adult children of the opposite sex. Adults and kids shared beds, men shared beds, women shared beds, but sex was never the agenda or the result. Thus when the popstar Michael Jackson was accused of sharing his bed with kids, outside of the piously perverted Anglo-Saxon world the rest of the world’s races really saw nothing untoward.

In the same way, until Europeans forced their own prudish guilt on naked Africans or for that matter on Indian rural dwellers, the idea that nakedness was ‘rude’ never entered the minds of those races. The prudery, inferiority, lack of sexual self-worth and self-esteem of the ‘Christian’ Europeans is the cause of a lopsided sexual awkwardness foisted on the rest of the global community.

A powerful non-European culture is tolerated by the Anglo-Saxons whereby one man can have five wives. Yet a weaker non-European culture where a woman can have five husbands is frowned upon and the cultural practice is slowly being wiped out because the Anglo-Saxon paymasters disapprove. The very same Anglo-Saxons mouth disapproval about harems – a concept that to this day it fails to understand – yet they bed-hop like nobody’s business.

The integrity of a harem has never been examined by the Anglo-Saxon, but apparently his own ‘yesterday I was in love and today I am not’ culture is normal and acceptable. Where is the responsibility of ‘cherish, loyalty and faithfulness unto death’ in this mentality?

Sexual intrigue and racial violence and the need to dominate and subjugate are closely linked. The energy for both dwells in the same spot. It emanates from the same point but differs in terms of the direction the energy impulse travels. If the base chakra energy outlet is aimed at the kundalinli chakra, then you will get the aberration that is the European mentality where everything has to be re-moulded to that ‘wave’ of thinking. By contrast, if the energy gate allows the sexual energy to travel higher up the chakra symmetry then a caring, affectionate, consolatory, humane attitude prevails.

If the Europeans could appreciate this fact of an identical energy impulse that manifests in two different mentalities, then it might be possible for the Europeans to rein in their excessive zeal for unnatural, inhumane, violent behaviour.

Simultaneously, Europeans have to realise that you cannot create a new toy without making sure that its creation will not subject another regardless of race or animal value into subjugation and humiliation. Nature has a way of dealing with something it no longer has a purpose for. It is called extinction.

Currently beautiful animals are on the verge of extinction due to the mass killing of them by the Europeans during their ‘hunt’ mentality era – shooting to kill animals who were way in the distance and of no threat to you or yours. This type of negative mass extinct has serious repercussions. The natural habitat of murdered animals is increasingly being commandeered for formal agriculture.

Nature in her wise fairness will extract an equal amount of punishment from the very race that coordinated the mass hunt-killing of those defenseless animals. If we take the idiotic back-to-front theory of Darwinian nonsense, even the Europeans have to hold their heads in shame for killing the very vehicle that theory claims humans emanated from.

Each of those ‘lower order’ animals had a pivotal and vital part to play in the evolution process of human. If one predator or its victim did not exist as it had then the whole shooting match of us looking as we do would have been very different. Instead of giving respect to our fellow animals, Europeans are forever abusing them in the name of superiority. There is not enough shame in the very casket that houses European consciousness for them to feel the shame I allude to. So I will not say that they should be ashamed for the mass murder of defenceless animals. Yes, those animals were murdered, not killed.

The industrial revolution that has enslaved humans was the thoughtless product of European mentality. Their desire to be superior within their own ranks then spilled over into dominating, via abjectly humiliating other races. An Indian television news anchor of an American network shared the humiliation of slave owners ordering one slave to defecate in the mouth of another slave. The TV anchor, Martin Bashir, who used the expression to put Sarah Palin in her place for making another one of her anal remarks, was sent on paid leave from his job (and no doubt will be sacked).

Such is the type of back-to-front idiocy that belies the European mentality vis-à-vis modernity. The industrial furnaces of pan-European nations should never have been built without investigation of their consequences. In the same way, refined food should never have been mass produced, since its disease-laden and disease-causing potential was known from the beginning. But hey, does the race European care about the health of the masses when there’s a quick buck to be made?

So what can be done even at this late stage?

It is down to each individual ordinarywallah race European person to stand up and be counted and form a collective to demand that the mega-industries change tack. With us at the grassroots level collaborating, those industries have no chance of surviving let alone winning this fight. And their agenda must be halted before they cause global human implosion.

We are being diseased from the chemically filled food we eat. That chemistry has to have a reaction. That reaction is the demise of the human race as we know it. And guess what? Since race Europeans eats more of this chemically enriched food than all the other races put together…well, you can work the rest out for yourselves.

I am sorry, but the future of the humans in a world dominated by race European is bleak, very very bleak, unless we take affirmative action as of now. A modernity in which machines do all our work for us will render humans enslaved by the very machines that race European has been hell-bent on creating in its pursuit of ever-greater profit. Just what are we humans in this race European dominated world going to do with all the spare time on our hands?

Twiddle our fingers, I suppose. Prudery will prevent us from making love, though we still have uninvolved, irresponsible, emotionless sex, I guess. But for how long, before machines replace our human partners in that enjoyment also?